Description of the study population and sample
| Description | Population | % of the population | Sample | % of the sample | % of the sample in relation to the population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judges | 74 | 5.34 | 15 | 9.26 | 20.27 |
| Analysts | 527 | 38.05 | 72 | 44.44 | 13.66 |
| Administrative technical specialists | 498 | 35.96 | 58 | 35.80 | 11.65 |
| Executives | 50 | 3.61 | 17 | 10.49 | 34.00 |
| Others | 236 | 17.04 | – | 0.00 | 0,00 |
| 1,385 | 100.00 | 162 | 100.00 | 11.70 |
| Description | Population | % of the population | Sample | % of the sample | % of the sample in relation to the population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judges | 74 | 5.34 | 15 | 9.26 | 20.27 |
| Analysts | 527 | 38.05 | 72 | 44.44 | 13.66 |
| Administrative technical specialists | 498 | 35.96 | 58 | 35.80 | 11.65 |
| Executives | 50 | 3.61 | 17 | 10.49 | 34.00 |
| Others | 236 | 17.04 | – | 0.00 | 0,00 |
| 1,385 | 100.00 | 162 | 100.00 | 11.70 |
Note:
Those classified as others are public servants who do not fit into the other classifications, according to the salary reports found on the website of the RLC of the 18th Region