Table 2

Brief summary of the advantages and disadvantages for introduced MCDM tools

MCDM toolsAdvantagesDisadvantages
AHPUsing a hierarchy system to evaluate tangible and intangible factors to achieve a structural solutionLarge number of comparisons when the problem is complicated
BWMHigh consistency for pairwise comparisons, yet few steps, and judgmentsIt employs parsimonious AHP, which may cause unknown side effects
VIKORObtaining compromise solution at the beginning of system designImpropriate preference ranking may occur because of the use of VIKOR’s maximum group utility calculation equation
ANPThe interdependence of alternatives is included by a network structureThe different effects between clusters could be neglected
PROMETHEEThe criteria does not need to be proportionate; easy to applyAdditional tool is needed for weighing the criteria preference
TOPSISSimple process based on logic of human choice studyThe relevant importance of solution distance is not considered
Sources: Al-Harbi (2001), Emovon and Oghenenyerovwho (2020); Moslem et al. (2020), Opricovic and Tzeng (2004); Velasquez and Hester (2013), Jahan et al. (2011); Huang et al. (2009), Opricovic and Tzeng (2007); Shih et al. (2007) 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal