Table 5 Certainty pairwise comparisons...

Table 5

Certainty pairwise comparisons with the best worst method

(The best) Criterion	Criteria	Importance	Certainty (%)	(The worst) Criterion	Importance	Certainty (%)
*Scenario 1*
Dimensional accuracy	Autoignition temperature	7	90	Melting point	2	90
	Cost	4	100		3	80
	Surface finish	3	90		6	70
	Dimensional accuracy	1	100		8	60
	Young’s Modulus	6	80		2	60
	Melting point	8	60		1	100
*Scenario 2*
Cost	Autoignition temperature	9	90	Autoignition temperature	1	100
	Cost	1	100		9	80
	Surface finish	6	90		2	90
	Dimensional accuracy	5	90		2	90
	Printing speed	3	80		5	80
	Melting point	8	70		2	100
*Scenario 3*
Printing speed	Young’s Modulus	8	100	Cost	2	90
	Cost	9	80		1	100
	Surface finish	3	90		5	100
	Dimensional accuracy	4	90		2	80
	Printing speed	1	100		9	80
	Melting point	7	60		2	70

(The best) Criterion	Criteria	Importance	Certainty (%)	(The worst) Criterion	Importance	Certainty (%)
Scenario 1
Dimensional accuracy	Autoignition temperature	7	90	Melting point	2	90
	Cost	4	100		3	80
	Surface finish	3	90		6	70
	Dimensional accuracy	1	100		8	60
	Young’s Modulus	6	80		2	60
	Melting point	8	60		1	100
Scenario 2
Cost	Autoignition temperature	9	90	Autoignition temperature	1	100
	Cost	1	100		9	80
	Surface finish	6	90		2	90
	Dimensional accuracy	5	90		2	90
	Printing speed	3	80		5	80
	Melting point	8	70		2	100
Scenario 3
Printing speed	Young’s Modulus	8	100	Cost	2	90
	Cost	9	80		1	100
	Surface finish	3	90		5	100
	Dimensional accuracy	4	90		2	80
	Printing speed	1	100		9	80
	Melting point	7	60		2	70

Sharing Unavailable