Table 1. Reported influence of... | Emerald Publishing

Table 1.

Reported influence of educational methods on student hand hygiene practice

Year	Practical (with UV light) %/95% C.I.	Therapist (O.T.)	Other healthcare workers	Online learning (e-learning)	Peer checking	Didacticpresentation
Second years (%) (n = 23)	48 0.27-0.70	61 0.39-0.80	30 0.14-0.53	22 0.08-0.44	18 0.06-0.40	0
Third years (%) (n = 21)	90 0.68-0.93	29 0.12-0.52	19 0.06-0.43	29 0.12-0.52	14 0.04-0.37	0
Fourth years (%) (n = 20)	80 0.56-0.93	25 0.10-0.49	30 0.13-0.54	25 0.10-0.49	20 0.07-0.44	0
All students (%)	72	39	27	25	17	0
(n = 64)	0.60-0.82	0.27-0.52	0.17-0.39	0.15-0.38	0.09-0.30
χ² value	18.34	12.32	7.27	10.70	5.86	0
P value	0.02	0.14	0.52	0.22	0.66	0

Year	Practical (with UV light) %/95% C.I.	Therapist (O.T.)	Other healthcare workers	Online learning (e-learning)	Peer checking	Didacticpresentation
Second years (%)(n = 23)	480.27-0.70	610.39-0.80	300.14-0.53	220.08-0.44	180.06-0.40	0
Third years (%)(n = 21)	900.68-0.93	290.12-0.52	190.06-0.43	290.12-0.52	140.04-0.37	0
Fourth years (%)(n = 20)	800.56-0.93	250.10-0.49	300.13-0.54	250.10-0.49	200.07-0.44	0
All students (%)	72	39	27	25	17	0
(n = 64)	0.60-0.82	0.27-0.52	0.17-0.39	0.15-0.38	0.09-0.30
χ² value	18.34	12.32	7.27	10.70	5.86	0
P value	0.02	0.14	0.52	0.22	0.66	0