Table A4.

HTMT Bias-corrected confidence intervals for discriminant validity assessment

95% CI
Direct effectOriginal sample (O)Sample mean (M)Bias2.50%97.50%
CPH → AQWINT0.5580.5580.0000.4690.638
FUTWTINT → AQWINT0.5950.594−0.0010.5200.669
FUTWTINT → CPH0.2640.2630.0000.1590.367
RISKAVOID → AQWINT0.4960.4970.0000.3980.590
RISKAVOID → CPH0.7820.7820.0000.7250.831
RISKAVOID → FUTWTINT0.0930.0980.0040.0230.204
WI → AQWINT0.7980.7980.0000.7510.838
WI → CPH0.4630.4620.0000.3670.545
WI → FUTWTINT0.5970.596−0.0010.5230.664
WI → RISKAVOID0.3320.3340.0030.2270.432
red_travTIME → AQWINT0.0350.0570.0210.0090.051
red_travTIME → CPH0.2270.2270.0000.1290.321
red_travTIME → FUTWTINT0.0910.0930.0020.0070.186
red_travTIME → RISKAVOID0.1730.1740.0010.0800.269
red_travTIME → WI0.0450.0720.0270.0220.048
red_trav$ → AQWINT0.0640.0720.0080.0180.160
red_trav$ → CPH0.2120.2110.0000.1120.304
red_trav$ → FUTWTINT0.0110.0420.0310.0000.034
red_trav$ → RISKAVOID0.2060.2060.0000.1060.305
red_trav$ → WI0.0810.0960.0150.0430.155
red_trav$ → red_travTIME0.6700.6700.0000.5950.744

Notes:

To provide evidence of discriminant validity, none of the Heterotrait–Monotrait Ratio (HTMT) bias-corrected confidence intervals (CI) should include 1. CIs are obtained through complete bootstrapping procedure with 5,000 subsamples

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal