Summary of pile performance acceptance
| Project | Number of pilesa | Weap | Capwap | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EOD | BOR | EOD | BOR | ||
| Owl Creek (B2P5) | 5 | No (−30%) | No (−27%) | No (−12%) | No (−5%) |
| Woods Wardell (PI2P1) | 14 | No (−65%) | No (−63%) | No (−3%) | Yes (10%) |
| Burns South (PI3P1) | 21 | No (−41%) | No (−40%) | No (−7%) | Yes (0·4%) |
| Burns south (A1P1) | 5 | No (−36%) | No (−34%) | Yes (2%) | Yes (11%) |
| Casper (A2P1) | 14 | Yes (33%) | Yes (33%) | Yes (30%) | Yes (46%) |
| Torrington (A2P1) | 9 | No (−15%) | Yes (6%) | No (−28%) | No (−19%) |
| Project | Number of piles | Weap | Capwap | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EOD | BOR | EOD | BOR | ||
| Owl Creek (B2P5) | 5 | No (−30%) | No (−27%) | No (−12%) | No (−5%) |
| Woods Wardell (PI2P1) | 14 | No (−65%) | No (−63%) | No (−3%) | Yes (10%) |
| Burns South (PI3P1) | 21 | No (−41%) | No (−40%) | No (−7%) | Yes (0·4%) |
| Burns south (A1P1) | 5 | No (−36%) | No (−34%) | Yes (2%) | Yes (11%) |
| Casper (A2P1) | 14 | Yes (33%) | Yes (33%) | Yes (30%) | Yes (46%) |
| Torrington (A2P1) | 9 | No (−15%) | Yes (6%) | No (−28%) | No (−19%) |
Number of production piles at the respective bent, pier or abutment location
B, bent number; PI, pier number; A, abutment number; P, pile number; Yes, satisfied the LRFD strength limit state; No, did not satisfy the LRFD strength limit state; %, percentage higher (positive) or lower (negative) than the factored load
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.