Table 3 Fit indices and standardised...

Table 3

Fit indices and standardised effects for mediation models analysing the impact of victim incivility on burnout symptoms via work–family conflict

Model	χ²	df	χ²/df	p	RMSEA	90% CI	SRMR	CFI	TLI
Model 1	590.30	326	1.81	0.000	0.05	0.05, 0.06	0.05	0.93	0.92

Standardised direct and indirect effects
Effects – Model 1	Estimate	SE	95% CI
Gender → Incivility	0.15	0.11	[−0.05, 0.25]
Profession → Incivility	−0.17	0.11	[−0.28, 0.03]
Job tenure in the position → Incivility	−0.01	0.01	[−0.23, 0.05]
Resilience → Incivility	−0.06	0.07	[−0.16, 0.06]
Incivility → WFC	0.75***	0.15	[0.22, 0.48]
Gender → WFC	0.20	0.20	[−0.07, 0.20]
Profession → WFC	−0.78***	0.21	[−0.40, −0.13]
Job tenure in the position → WFC	−0.01	0.07	[−0.13, 0.10]
Resilience → WFC	−0.34	0.18	[−0.25, 0.01]
Gender → Exhaustion	0.21	0.14	[−0.04, 0.21]
Profession → Exhaustion	−0.10	0.14	[−0.17, 0.07]
Job tenure in the position → Exhaustion	−0.01	0.01	[−0.16, 0.04]
Resilience → Exhaustion	−0.26*	0.11	[−0.24, −0.03]
WFC → Exhaustion	0.36***	0.07	[0.35, 0.62]
Incivility → Exhaustion	0.34*	0.14	[0.07, 0.36]
Incivility → WFC → Exhaustion	0.27***	0.06	[0.17, 0.42]
Total effects on exhaustion	0.61***	0.06	[0.33, 0.97]
Gender → Cynicism	−0.20	0.18	[−0.25, 0.07]
Profession → Cynicism	−0.19	0.17	[−0.25, 0.06]
Job tenure in the position → Cynicism	0.00	0.01	[−0.12, 0.12]
Resilience → Cynicism	−0.50***	0.14	[−0.38, −0.12]
WFC → Cynicism	0.17**	0.06	[0.10, 0.38]
Incivility → Cynicism	0.26*	0.11	[0.02, 0.30]
Incivility → WFC → Cynicism	0.13**	0.05	[0.05, 0.24]
Total effects on Cynicism	0.38***	0.11	[0.18, 0.61]

Standardised direct and indirect effects
Effects – Model 1	Estimate	SE	95% CI
Gender → Incivility	0.15	0.11	[−0.05, 0.25]
Profession → Incivility	−0.17	0.11	[−0.28, 0.03]
Job tenure in the position → Incivility	−0.01	0.01	[−0.23, 0.05]
Resilience → Incivility	−0.06	0.07	[−0.16, 0.06]
Incivility → WFC	0.75***	0.15	[0.22, 0.48]
Gender → WFC	0.20	0.20	[−0.07, 0.20]
Profession → WFC	−0.78***	0.21	[−0.40, −0.13]
Job tenure in the position → WFC	−0.01	0.07	[−0.13, 0.10]
Resilience → WFC	−0.34	0.18	[−0.25, 0.01]
Gender → Exhaustion	0.21	0.14	[−0.04, 0.21]
Profession → Exhaustion	−0.10	0.14	[−0.17, 0.07]
Job tenure in the position → Exhaustion	−0.01	0.01	[−0.16, 0.04]
Resilience → Exhaustion	−0.26*	0.11	[−0.24, −0.03]
WFC → Exhaustion	0.36***	0.07	[0.35, 0.62]
Incivility → Exhaustion	0.34*	0.14	[0.07, 0.36]
Incivility → WFC → Exhaustion	0.27***	0.06	[0.17, 0.42]
Total effects on exhaustion	0.61***	0.06	[0.33, 0.97]
Gender → Cynicism	−0.20	0.18	[−0.25, 0.07]
Profession → Cynicism	−0.19	0.17	[−0.25, 0.06]
Job tenure in the position → Cynicism	0.00	0.01	[−0.12, 0.12]
Resilience → Cynicism	−0.50***	0.14	[−0.38, −0.12]
WFC → Cynicism	0.17**	0.06	[0.10, 0.38]
Incivility → Cynicism	0.26*	0.11	[0.02, 0.30]
Incivility → WFC → Cynicism	0.13**	0.05	[0.05, 0.24]
Total effects on Cynicism	0.38***	0.11	[0.18, 0.61]

Note(s): WFC = work-family conflict; Social support = social support seeking; Incivility = victim incivility; Exhaustion = emotional exhaustion; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable