Table 4 Path coefficients for the model...

Table 4

Path coefficients for the model analysing the moderating role of work–family conflict and the moderating effects of social support seeking in the relationship between victim incivility and burnout symptoms

Model: Incivility * Support → WFC * Support → Exhaustion/cynicism + Incivility * Support → Exhaustion/cynicism	Path coefficients
	Estimate	SE	95% CI
Gender → Incivility	0.16	0.11	[-0.06, 0.37]
Profession → Incivility	−0.17	0.11	[−0.39, 0.05]
Job tenure in the position → Incivility	−0.05	0.04	[−0.01, 0.04]
Resilience → Incivility	−0.06	0.08	[−0.21, 0.10]
Incivility → WFC	0.74***	0.14	[0.46 0.99]
Gender → WFC	0.18	0.18	[−0.17, 0.48]
Profession → WFC	−0.77***	0.19	[−0.99, −0.45]
Job tenure in the position → WFC	−0.03	0.01	[−0.02, 0.01]
Resilience → WFC	−0.32	0.13	[−0.58, −0.10]
WFC → Exhaustion	0.32***	0.05	[0.22, 0.40]
WFC → Cynicism	0.14**	0.05	[0.03, 0.23]
WFC * Social support → Exhaustion	0.17***	0.04	[0.09, 0.24]
WFC * Social support → Cynicism	0.18***	0.05	[0.09, 0.26]
Incivility → Exhaustion	0.32***	0.09	[0.15, 0.47]
Incivility → Cynicism	0.25*	0.10	[0.04, 0.42]
Social support → WFC	0.07	0.09	[−0.10, 0.21]
Incivility * Social support → WFC	0.06	0.14	[−0.21, 0.30]
Incivility * Social support → Exhaustion	0.13	0.10	[−0.34, 0.09]
Incivility * Social support → Cynicism	−0.10	0.12	[−0.21, 0.29]
Social support → Exhaustion	0.52***	0.13	[0.28, 0.73]
Social support → Cynicism	0.47**	0.14	[0.20, 0.69]
Gender → Exhaustion	0.16	0.12	[−0.08, 0.36]
Profession → Exhaustion	−0.11	0.13	[−0.36, 0.11]
Job tenure in the position → Exhaustion	−0.01	0.01	[−0.01, 0.01]
Resilience → Exhaustion	−0.23*	0.10	[−0.42, −0.07]
Gender → Cynicism	−0.22	0.15	[−0.51, 0.02]
Profession → Cynicism	−0.19	0.16	[−0.50, 0.07]
Job tenure in the position → Cynicism	0.01	0.01	[−0.01, 0.01]
Resilience → Cynicism	−0.48***	0.12	[−0.71, −0.29]

Model: Incivility * Support → WFC * Support → Exhaustion/cynicism + Incivility * Support → Exhaustion/cynicism	Path coefficients
	Estimate	SE	95% CI
Gender → Incivility	0.16	0.11	[-0.06, 0.37]
Profession → Incivility	−0.17	0.11	[−0.39, 0.05]
Job tenure in the position → Incivility	−0.05	0.04	[−0.01, 0.04]
Resilience → Incivility	−0.06	0.08	[−0.21, 0.10]
Incivility → WFC	0.74***	0.14	[0.46 0.99]
Gender → WFC	0.18	0.18	[−0.17, 0.48]
Profession → WFC	−0.77***	0.19	[−0.99, −0.45]
Job tenure in the position → WFC	−0.03	0.01	[−0.02, 0.01]
Resilience → WFC	−0.32	0.13	[−0.58, −0.10]
WFC → Exhaustion	0.32***	0.05	[0.22, 0.40]
WFC → Cynicism	0.14**	0.05	[0.03, 0.23]
WFC * Social support → Exhaustion	0.17***	0.04	[0.09, 0.24]
WFC * Social support → Cynicism	0.18***	0.05	[0.09, 0.26]
Incivility → Exhaustion	0.32***	0.09	[0.15, 0.47]
Incivility → Cynicism	0.25*	0.10	[0.04, 0.42]
Social support → WFC	0.07	0.09	[−0.10, 0.21]
Incivility * Social support → WFC	0.06	0.14	[−0.21, 0.30]
Incivility * Social support → Exhaustion	0.13	0.10	[−0.34, 0.09]
Incivility * Social support → Cynicism	−0.10	0.12	[−0.21, 0.29]
Social support → Exhaustion	0.52***	0.13	[0.28, 0.73]
Social support → Cynicism	0.47**	0.14	[0.20, 0.69]
Gender → Exhaustion	0.16	0.12	[−0.08, 0.36]
Profession → Exhaustion	−0.11	0.13	[−0.36, 0.11]
Job tenure in the position → Exhaustion	−0.01	0.01	[−0.01, 0.01]
Resilience → Exhaustion	−0.23*	0.10	[−0.42, −0.07]
Gender → Cynicism	−0.22	0.15	[−0.51, 0.02]
Profession → Cynicism	−0.19	0.16	[−0.50, 0.07]
Job tenure in the position → Cynicism	0.01	0.01	[−0.01, 0.01]
Resilience → Cynicism	−0.48***	0.12	[−0.71, −0.29]

Note(s): WFC = work-family conflict; Social support = social support seeking; Incivility = victim incivility; Exhaustion = emotional exhaustion; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable