The overall evaluation
| Cases analyzed | Qual. score | Quant. score | Suggestion | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 2 | 3.11 | 3.67 | Develop | Convergent assessments |
| Case 5 | 4.33 | 3.33 | High potential and good validations | |
| Case 2 | 1.22 | 3.33 | Maintain- correct | Prospective business model not clearly defined |
| Case 7 | 1.89 | 3.67 | ||
| Case 8 | 1.78 | 3.22 | ||
| Case 6 | 4.22 | 2.78 | Maintain- correct | Market validations to be improved |
| Case 4 | 4 | 2.78 | ||
| Case 1 | 1.89 | 1.67 | Revalue | Stalemate |
| Cases analyzed | Qual. score | Quant. score | Suggestion | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 2 | 3.11 | 3.67 | Develop | Convergent assessments |
| Case 5 | 4.33 | 3.33 | High potential and good validations | |
| Case 2 | 1.22 | 3.33 | Maintain- correct | Prospective business model not clearly defined |
| Case 7 | 1.89 | 3.67 | ||
| Case 8 | 1.78 | 3.22 | ||
| Case 6 | 4.22 | 2.78 | Maintain- correct | Market validations to be improved |
| Case 4 | 4 | 2.78 | ||
| Case 1 | 1.89 | 1.67 | Revalue | Stalemate |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.