Comparison of response rates (online versus paper-based evaluation)
| Authors (Year) | Institution | Response rates |
|---|---|---|
| Layne et al. (1999) | Southeastern University | 47% – online vs 60% – paper |
| Sax et al. (2003) | Several US institutions | 17% – online vs 24% – paper |
| Dommeyer et al. (2004) | California State University | 43% – online vs 75% – paper |
| Anderson et al. (2005) | University of Kentucky | 83% – online vs 80% – paper |
| Avery et al. (2006) | Cornell University | 47% – online vs 69% – paper |
| Laubsch (2006) | Fairleigh Dickinson University | 61% – online vs 82% – paper |
| Nair et al. (2008) | Monash University | 31% – online vs 56% – paper |
| Perrett (2013) | Large university in South US | 71% – online vs 68% – paper |
| Authors (Year) | Institution | Response rates |
|---|---|---|
| Southeastern University | 47% – online vs 60% – paper | |
| Several US institutions | 17% – online vs 24% – paper | |
| California State University | 43% – online vs 75% – paper | |
| University of Kentucky | 83% – online vs 80% – paper | |
| Cornell University | 47% – online vs 69% – paper | |
| Fairleigh Dickinson University | 61% – online vs 82% – paper | |
| Monash University | 31% – online vs 56% – paper | |
| Large university in South US | 71% – online vs 68% – paper |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.