Descriptive analysis
| Likert mean | Std. deviation | |
|---|---|---|
| Statement on national government support | ||
| Making procurement performance measurement and reporting compulsory incentivizes the use of strategic procurement performance metrics | 4.48 | 0.68 |
| National government provides appropriate capacity building for strategic procurement performance measurement and reporting | 3.36 | 1.1 |
| National government facilitates documentation of strategic procurement performance measurement information from county governments for benchmarking purposes | 3.06 | 1.1 |
| Average | 3.75 | 0.99 |
| Statement on regulatory framework | ||
| There is specific law(s) that regulate public procurement performance measurement in county governments | 3.64 | 1.21 |
| The law provides where and when public procurement performance measurement within county governments should be reported | 3.62 | 1.03 |
| There are negative consequences if the county government fails to comply with regulatory framework on public procurement performance measurement | 4.29 | 0.65 |
| Law governing procurement performance measurement within county governments is clear | 2.94 | 1.42 |
| Public procurement performance measurement regulations explicitly identify types of procurement performance metrics to be used for instance input, output and outcome metrics | 4.14 | 0.90 |
| Strategic procurement performance metrics such as outcome indicators are specifically mentioned in the regulatory framework | 4.20 | 0.87 |
| Average (regulatory framework) | 3.81 | 0.87 |
| Likert mean | Std. deviation | |
|---|---|---|
| Making procurement performance measurement and reporting compulsory incentivizes the use of strategic procurement performance metrics | 4.48 | 0.68 |
| National government provides appropriate capacity building for strategic procurement performance measurement and reporting | 3.36 | 1.1 |
| National government facilitates documentation of strategic procurement performance measurement information from county governments for benchmarking purposes | 3.06 | 1.1 |
| There is specific law(s) that regulate public procurement performance measurement in county governments | 3.64 | 1.21 |
| The law provides where and when public procurement performance measurement within county governments should be reported | 3.62 | 1.03 |
| There are negative consequences if the county government fails to comply with regulatory framework on public procurement performance measurement | 4.29 | 0.65 |
| Law governing procurement performance measurement within county governments is clear | 2.94 | 1.42 |
| Public procurement performance measurement regulations explicitly identify types of procurement performance metrics to be used for instance input, output and outcome metrics | 4.14 | 0.90 |
| Strategic procurement performance metrics such as outcome indicators are specifically mentioned in the regulatory framework | 4.20 | 0.87 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.