Table 1. Summary statistics and... | Emerald Publishing

Table 1.

Summary statistics and correlations

	Mean	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
1. Managers’ response (DV)	0.35	0.48
2. Age	34.64	9.63	0.02
3. Gender	0.53	0.50	0.01	−0.03
4. Years of management experience	6.92	5.63	0.06	0.41**	0.01
5. Retributive orientation	4.59	1.35	0.41**	0.07*	0.01	0.06
6. Reparative orientation	5.49	1.02	−0.06	0.08*	−0.04	0.04	0.10**
7. Moral considerations	0.50	0.50	−0.05	−0.08	−0.02	−0.04	0.02	−0.02
8. Social considerations	0.50	0.50	−0.14*	−0.10	−0.03	−0.03	−0.05	0.15**	n/a
9. Instrumental considerations	0.50	0.50	−0.15*	−0.00	−0.06	0.04	−0.07	0.14*	n/a	n/a
10. Perceived seriousness of transgression	5.14	1.10	0.16*	0.07*	−0.05	0.08*	0.26**	0.19**	−0.02	0.04	0.07
11. Anger	4.16	1.66	0.22**	0.07*	−0.01	0.08*	0.30**	0.11**	0.07	0.11	−0.04	0.47**
12. Moral outrage	4.26	1.70	0.14**	0.05	−0.05	0.06	0.30**	0.17**	0.03	0.07	−0.01	0.56**	0.60**
13. Sympathy	3.72	1.70	−0.06	0.04	−0.01	0.00	−0.03	0.10**	−0.01	−0.02	0.13**	0.11**	0.05	0.12**

	Mean	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
1. Managers’ response (DV)	0.35	0.48
2. Age	34.64	9.63	0.02
3. Gender	0.53	0.50	0.01	−0.03
4. Years of management experience	6.92	5.63	0.06	0.41**	0.01
5. Retributive orientation	4.59	1.35	0.41**	0.07*	0.01	0.06
6. Reparative orientation	5.49	1.02	−0.06	0.08*	−0.04	0.04	0.10**
7. Moral considerations	0.50	0.50	−0.05	−0.08	−0.02	−0.04	0.02	−0.02
8. Social considerations	0.50	0.50	−0.14*	−0.10	−0.03	−0.03	−0.05	0.15**	n/a
9. Instrumental considerations	0.50	0.50	−0.15*	−0.00	−0.06	0.04	−0.07	0.14*	n/a	n/a
10. Perceived seriousness of transgression	5.14	1.10	0.16*	0.07*	−0.05	0.08*	0.26**	0.19**	−0.02	0.04	0.07
11. Anger	4.16	1.66	0.22**	0.07*	−0.01	0.08*	0.30**	0.11**	0.07	0.11	−0.04	0.47**
12. Moral outrage	4.26	1.70	0.14**	0.05	−0.05	0.06	0.30**	0.17**	0.03	0.07	−0.01	0.56**	0.60**
13. Sympathy	3.72	1.70	−0.06	0.04	−0.01	0.00	−0.03	0.10**	−0.01	−0.02	0.13**	0.11**	0.05	0.12**

Notes:

N = 894; *Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed); **correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed)

Source: Table by authors