Table 3

Regression results of analysis using two-step system GMM

Variables nameModel-(I) OPModel-(II) ROAModel-(III) ROEModel(IV) TQ
Dependent variable(t−1)0.310** (0.119)0.603*** (0.046)0.388** (0.164)0.231** (0.092)
Advertising exp0.103* (0.053)0.253** (0.117)1.289** (0.598)0.001 (0.011)
Advertising exp. (t−1)−0.106** (0.043)−0.086 (0.079)−1.269** (0.465)−0.013 (0.010)
LR−0.045** (0.021)−0.011 (0.012)−0.352* (0.203)0.0001 (0.002)
SZ1.144*** (0.374)0.329 (0.269)0.375 (0.826)−0.053** (0.021)
IR12.29** (4.738)3.946 (4.828)127.2** (54.90)−0.215 (0.672)
NPL−0.041** (0.018)0.003 (0.003)−0.037 (0.072)0.0003 (0.002)
DR−13.43*** (4.125)−3.889 (5.581)−150.1** (55.15)−0.925 (0.661)
F statistic21492.7***259.59 ***224.15 ***71.81***
Year effectYesYesYesYes
Groups/Instruments28/2529/2229/1629/27
AR(1) test (p-value)0.0060.0070.0290.176
AR(2) test (p-value)0.2050.1230.1070.665
Hansen test of over-identification (p-value)0.1020.1940.2640.198
cmdxtabond2xtabond2xtabond2xtabond2

Note(s): This table depicts the dynamic panel data regression analysis using two-step system generalized method of moments (2SGMM). In the parentheses below the coefficients, the robust standard errors are shown. The symbols ***, ** and * denote statistical significance at the 1, 5 and 10% levels, respectively

Source(s): Authors own calculation

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal