Summary of empirical evidence results for conventional and Islamic banks: a comparison between conventional and Islamic banks
| Determinants | Dependent variable: OP | Dependent variable: ROA | Dependent variable: ROE | Dependent variable: TQ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conv.Banks | Islam banks | Conv. Banks | IslamBanks | Conv. Banks | Islam banks | Conv. Banks | Islam banks | |
| Dependent variable(t−1) | +*** | +*** | +*** | +*** | +*** | +*** | +** | +** |
| Advertising exp | Ø | Ø | Ø | +*** | Ø | Ø | Ø | Ø |
| Advertising exp(t−1) | Ø | Ø | Ø | Ø | Ø | Ø | Ø | Ø |
| Determinants | Dependent variable: OP | Dependent variable: ROA | Dependent variable: ROE | Dependent variable: TQ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conv.Banks | Islam banks | Conv. Banks | IslamBanks | Conv. Banks | Islam banks | Conv. Banks | Islam banks | |
| Dependent variable( | +*** | +*** | +*** | +*** | +*** | +*** | +** | +** |
| Advertising exp | Ø | Ø | Ø | +*** | Ø | Ø | Ø | Ø |
| Advertising exp( | Ø | Ø | Ø | Ø | Ø | Ø | Ø | Ø |
Note(s): This table demonstrates the summary of empirical evidence of the effect of advertising expenditure on the performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks. Symbols (+) and (Ø) indicate positive and no significant relationships, respectively. The asterisk signs of *** and** indicate statistical significance at the 1 and 5% levels, respectively
Source(s): Authors own calculation
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.