Emerald Publishing

Table 5

F&V consumption at lunchtime in dependence of the treatment group, menu course, attitudes and habitual consumption (ordered logit estimation)

Variables	Vegetable consumption		Fruit consumption
Variables	Mean	S.E.	Mean	S.E.
Intercept	−4.193***	0.678	−2.098***	0.711
Treatment 1	0.384	0.298	0.956***	0.355
Treatment 2	−0.042	0.307	0.114	0.367
first course consumption	0.151	0.154	0.101	0.164
second course consumption	0.813 **	0.156	0.039	0.160
Side dish consumption	–	–	0.253	0.168
Attitude toward vegetables/fruit consumption	−0.008	0.190	0.677***	0.226
Frequency of consumption at home	1.216 **	0.385	0.835**	0.418
F&V availability at home	0.347 **	0.158	−0.136	0.156
Number of observation	513	513
Log-Likelihood	−399.339	−400.810

Variables	Vegetable consumption		Fruit consumption
Variables	Mean	S.E.	Mean	S.E.
Intercept	−4.193***	0.678	−2.098***	0.711
Treatment 1	0.384	0.298	0.956***	0.355
Treatment 2	−0.042	0.307	0.114	0.367
first course consumption	0.151	0.154	0.101	0.164
second course consumption	0.813 **	0.156	0.039	0.160
Side dish consumption	–	–	0.253	0.168
Attitude toward vegetables/fruit consumption	−0.008	0.190	0.677***	0.226
Frequency of consumption at home	1.216 **	0.385	0.835**	0.418
F&V availability at home	0.347 **	0.158	−0.136	0.156
Number of observation	513	513
Log-Likelihood	−399.339	−400.810

Notes:

Panel data from the first intervention, the second intervention and follow-up were analyzed. Presented models, ordered logit regression were estimated using R3.3.2. *, ** and *** denote significant difference at the 0.10, 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively. Attitude toward F&V consumption, frequency of F&V consumption and F&V availability at home were reported by parents and were treated as ordered variables. Side dish consumption was only an input for determinants of fruit consumption. Control is a baseline for Tr.1 and Tr.2

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable