BWM application result
| Criteria | Respondent 1 | Respondent 2 | Respondent 3 | Geometric mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main criteria priorities | ||||
| Transport capacity | 0.273 | 0.470 | 0.455 | 0.388 |
| Airport Operations and Facilities' Capacity | 0.455 | 0.202 | 0.299 | 0.301 |
| Economic growth | 0.136 | 0.151 | 0.119 | 0.135 |
| Financial performance | 0.045 | 0.121 | 0.052 | 0.066 |
| Airport brand value | 0.091 | 0.056 | 0.075 | 0.072 |
| ξL* | 0.091 | 0.134 | 0.142 | |
| Sub-criteria (1) priorities | ||||
| No. of airlines | 0.083 | 0.111 | 0.169 | 0.116 |
| No. of flights | 0.208 | 0.244 | 0.740 | 0.335 |
| Global network | 0.708 | 0.644 | 0.091 | 0.346 |
| ξL* | 0.125 | 0.089 | 0.104 | |
| Sub-criteria (2) priorities | ||||
| No. of terminals | 0.208 | 0.244 | 0.197 | 0.216 |
| Airport cargo capacity | 0.708 | 0.644 | 0.712 | 0.688 |
| No. of aprons | 0.083 | 0.111 | 0.091 | 0.094 |
| ξL* | 0.125 | 0.089 | 0.076 | |
| Sub-criteria (3) priorities | ||||
| Cargo volumes | 0.327 | 0.091 | 0.738 | 0.280 |
| Cargo growth rate | 0.429 | 0.291 | 0.179 | 0.281 |
| GDP | 0.245 | 0.618 | 0.083 | 0.233 |
| ξL* | 1.388 | 0.255 | 0.155 | |
| Criteria | Respondent 1 | Respondent 2 | Respondent 3 | Geometric mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transport capacity | 0.273 | |||
| Airport Operations and Facilities' Capacity | 0.202 | 0.299 | 0.301 | |
| Economic growth | 0.136 | 0.151 | 0.119 | 0.135 |
| Financial performance | 0.045 | 0.121 | 0.052 | 0.066 |
| Airport brand value | 0.091 | 0.056 | 0.075 | 0.072 |
| ξL* | 0.091 | 0.134 | 0.142 | |
| No. of airlines | 0.083 | 0.111 | 0.169 | 0.116 |
| No. of flights | 0.208 | 0.244 | 0.335 | |
| Global network | 0.091 | |||
| ξL* | 0.125 | 0.089 | 0.104 | |
| No. of terminals | 0.208 | 0.244 | 0.197 | 0.216 |
| Airport cargo capacity | ||||
| No. of aprons | 0.083 | 0.111 | 0.091 | 0.094 |
| ξL* | 0.125 | 0.089 | 0.076 | |
| Cargo volumes | 0.327 | 0.091 | 0.280 | |
| Cargo growth rate | 0.291 | 0.179 | ||
| GDP | 0.245 | 0.618 | 0.083 | 0.233 |
| ξL* | 1.388 | 0.255 | 0.155 | |
Note(s): ξL*: Consistency ratio: acceptable (Liang et al., 2020)
Source(s): Authors' own work based on the survey responses
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.