Pairwise comparisons of technology cost for goods tracking technology
| Sample 1-sample 2 | Test statistic | Std. error | Std. test statistic | Sig | Adj. sig.a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expensive-Very Expensive | 0.486 | 4.905 | 0.099 | 0.921 | 1.000 |
| Expensive-Affordable | −18.608 | 6.309 | −2.949 | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Very Expensive-Affordable | −18.122 | 6.232 | −2.908 | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Sample 1-sample 2 | Test statistic | Std. error | Std. test statistic | Sig | Adj. sig.a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expensive-Very Expensive | 0.486 | 4.905 | 0.099 | 0.921 | 1.000 |
| Expensive-Affordable | −18.608 | 6.309 | −2.949 | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Very Expensive-Affordable | −18.122 | 6.232 | −2.908 | 0.004 | 0.011 |
Note(s): Each row tests the null hypothesis that the Sample 1 and Sample 2 distributions are the same
Asymptotic significances (2-sided tests) are displayed. The significance level is 0.050
aSignificance values have been adjusted by the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests
Source(s): Authors own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.