Pairwise comparisons of technology cost for big data
| Sample 1-sample 2 | Test statistic | Std. error | Std. test statistic | Sig | Adj. sig.a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expensive-Very Expensive | 4.396 | 4.797 | 0.916 | 0.360 | 1.000 |
| Expensive-Affordable | −19.532 | 6.171 | −3.165 | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Very Expensive-Affordable | −15.136 | 6.096 | −2.483 | 0.013 | 0.039 |
| Sample 1-sample 2 | Test statistic | Std. error | Std. test statistic | Sig | Adj. sig.a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expensive-Very Expensive | 4.396 | 4.797 | 0.916 | 0.360 | 1.000 |
| Expensive-Affordable | −19.532 | 6.171 | −3.165 | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Very Expensive-Affordable | −15.136 | 6.096 | −2.483 | 0.013 | 0.039 |
Note(s): Each row tests the null hypothesis that the Sample 1 and Sample 2 distributions are the same
Asymptotic significances (2-sided tests) are displayed. The significance level is 0.050
aSignificance values have been adjusted by the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests
Source(s): Authors own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.