Table 2. Profile of respondents by type... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2.

Profile of respondents by type of system^a used (n = 88)

System	No. of respondents	Average years use	% US institutions in sample (%)	AACSB accreditation status			Institution profile
System	No. of respondents	Average years use	% US institutions in sample (%)	Accredited	Pursuing	No response	FTE business students (average)	FTE business faculty (average)	FTE institution students (average)
Academ	15	3.0	0.0	7	6	2	2,252.9	90.3	16,959.2
Faculty success	30	7.6	85.0	26	3	1	2,737.4	79.9	24,054.1
Interfolio	6	2.1	50.0	3	1	2	3,262.5	60.0	20,500.5
Sedona	15	6.1	73.3	12	3	0	1,952.3	57.8	10,202.2
In-house and manual systems	16	7.3	50.0	8	6	2	2,847.0	110.3	12,315.4
Other^b	6	7.0	0.0	3	2	1	2,337.5	104.8	20,561.5
All	88	6.0	51.1	59	21	8	2,550.2	83.7	17,979.0

System	No. of respondents	Average years use	% US institutions in sample (%)	AACSB accreditation status			Institution profile
System	No. of respondents	Average years use	% US institutions in sample (%)	Accredited	Pursuing	No response	FTE business students (average)	FTE business faculty (average)	FTE institution students (average)
Academ	15	3.0	0.0	7	6	2	2,252.9	90.3	16,959.2
Faculty success	30	7.6	85.0	26	3	1	2,737.4	79.9	24,054.1
Interfolio	6	2.1	50.0	3	1	2	3,262.5	60.0	20,500.5
Sedona	15	6.1	73.3	12	3	0	1,952.3	57.8	10,202.2
In-house and manual systems	16	7.3	50.0	8	6	2	2,847.0	110.3	12,315.4
Other^b	6	7.0	0.0	3	2	1	2,337.5	104.8	20,561.5
All	88	6.0	51.1	59	21	8	2,550.2	83.7	17,979.0

Notes:

^a System used by institution for faculty research was used to develop respondent profiles. ^b Other included four different systems: ORCID, Pure, SPOL and Symplectic