Table 9 Consumers' responses to food...

Table 9

Consumers' responses to food safety risk

Variables	Low-risk perception	Moderate-risk perception	High-risk perception	Very-high-risk perception
	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)
Frequency of food safety information seeking¹ from
TV	3.82 (0.80)	3.83 (0.80)	3.98 (0.81)	4.05 (0.90)
(2)Social media	3.14^a (1.29)	3.13^a (1.17)	3.34^a (1.27)	3.78^b (1.29)
(3)Relatives and peers	3.60^a (0.84)	3.56^a (0.94)	3.60^a (0.96)	4.02^b (0.90)
% of respondents purchasing food from supermarkets*	37.5	36.7	37.2	49.1
% of respondent self-provisioning of food*	65.4	67.5	54.9	53.6

Variables	Low-risk perception	Moderate-risk perception	High-risk perception	Very-high-risk perception
	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)
Frequency of food safety information seeking¹ from
TV	3.82 (0.80)	3.83 (0.80)	3.98 (0.81)	4.05 (0.90)
(2)Social media	3.14^a (1.29)	3.13^a (1.17)	3.34^a (1.27)	3.78^b (1.29)
(3)Relatives and peers	3.60^a (0.84)	3.56^a (0.94)	3.60^a (0.96)	4.02^b (0.90)
% of respondents purchasing food from supermarkets*	37.5	36.7	37.2	49.1
% of respondent self-provisioning of food*	65.4	67.5	54.9	53.6

Note(s): ^{a, b} Scores in one row with a different superscript are significantly different at p < 0.05 using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test

*group differences are statistically significant at 5% level, using λ² test

¹: variables are measured by five-point Likert scale from 1 (rarely) to 5 (usually)

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable