Table 2. Comparison of the accuracy... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2.

Comparison of the accuracy measure η (as per equation (2)) for the surface and caisson foundations, for each failure envelope shown in Figs 7–10

Failure envelope	η (single swipe)	η (sequential swipe)	η (load probe)
Surface
Figure 7(a)	0·99	1·01	1·01
Figure 8(a)	1·01	1·03	1·04
Figure 9(a)	0·89	1·01	1·03
Figure 10(a)	0·87	1·01	1·04
Figure 10(b)	0·83	1·01	1·05
Figure 10(c)	0·81	1·01	1·07
Caisson
Figure 7(b)	0·92	1·01	1·01
Figure 8(b)	0·94	1·03	1·02
Figure 9(b)	0·88	1·04	1·00
Figure 10(d)	0·90	1·04	1·01
Figure 10(e)	0·87	1·04	1·02
Figure 10(f)	0·78	1·04	1·04
Average	0·89	1·02	1·03

Failure envelope	η (single swipe)	η (sequential swipe)	η (load probe)
Surface
Figure 7(a)	0·99	1·01	1·01
Figure 8(a)	1·01	1·03	1·04
Figure 9(a)	0·89	1·01	1·03
Figure 10(a)	0·87	1·01	1·04
Figure 10(b)	0·83	1·01	1·05
Figure 10(c)	0·81	1·01	1·07
Caisson
Figure 7(b)	0·92	1·01	1·01
Figure 8(b)	0·94	1·03	1·02
Figure 9(b)	0·88	1·04	1·00
Figure 10(d)	0·90	1·04	1·01
Figure 10(e)	0·87	1·04	1·02
Figure 10(f)	0·78	1·04	1·04
Average	0·89	1·02	1·03