Multivariate analysis of audit fees and auditor industry leadership: Italy sample
| Dependent variable is the natural logarithm of audit fees (N = 1,050) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model (1) | Model (2) | Model (3) | ||||
| Estimate | p-value | Estimate | p-value | Estimate | p-value | |
| Panel A | ||||||
| Intercept | 10.470 | <0.001 | 10.266 | <0.001 | 10.521 | <0.001 |
| SIZE | 0.268 | <0.001 | 0.272 | <0.001 | 0.282 | <0.001 |
| CATA | 0.628 | 0.015 | 0.647 | 0.014 | 0.653 | 0.013 |
| QUICK | −0.216 | <0.001 | −0.219 | <0.001 | −0.212 | <0.001 |
| LEV | −0.489 | 0.118 | −0.489 | 0.121 | −0.469 | 0.138 |
| ROA | −0.669 | 0.165 | −0.667 | 0.178 | −0.643 | 0.199 |
| LOSS | 0.108 | 0.178 | 0.102 | 0.205 | 0.097 | 0.228 |
| σ (CFO) | −0.054 | 0.771 | −0.066 | 0.718 | −0.053 | 0.774 |
| SALES GROWTH | −0.004 | <0.001 | −0.004 | <0.001 | −0.004 | <0.001 |
| TENURE | 0.005 | 0.678 | 0.005 | 0.658 | 0.008 | 0.474 |
| ACCR_1 | 0.037 | 0.051 | 0.035 | 0.070 | 0.035 | 0.069 |
| BIGN | 0.197 | 0.050 | 0.224 | 0.027 | 0.255 | 0.012 |
| UNCLEAN OPINION | 0.000 | 0.993 | 0.010 | 0.846 | 0.018 | 0.736 |
| LABOR COST | −0.013 | 0.776 | −0.009 | 0.858 | −0.016 | 0.729 |
| National Leader | 0.205 | 0.002 | ||||
| Area Leader | 0.114 | 0.079 | ||||
| City Leader | 0.006 | 0.929 | ||||
| Industry and Year fixed effects | Included | Included | Included | |||
| Adj. R2 | 0.406 | 0.397 | 0.407 | |||
| Panel B: test of difference in coefficients | Difference in coefficients | F-test (p-value) | ||||
| National Leader = Area Leader | 0.091 | 5.09 (0.024) | ||||
| Dependent variable is the natural logarithm of audit fees ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model (1) | Model (2) | Model (3) | ||||
| Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | ||||
| Intercept | 10.470 | <0.001 | 10.266 | <0.001 | 10.521 | <0.001 |
| 0.268 | <0.001 | 0.272 | <0.001 | 0.282 | <0.001 | |
| 0.628 | 0.015 | 0.647 | 0.014 | 0.653 | 0.013 | |
| −0.216 | <0.001 | −0.219 | <0.001 | −0.212 | <0.001 | |
| −0.489 | 0.118 | −0.489 | 0.121 | −0.469 | 0.138 | |
| −0.669 | 0.165 | −0.667 | 0.178 | −0.643 | 0.199 | |
| 0.108 | 0.178 | 0.102 | 0.205 | 0.097 | 0.228 | |
| −0.054 | 0.771 | −0.066 | 0.718 | −0.053 | 0.774 | |
| −0.004 | <0.001 | −0.004 | <0.001 | −0.004 | <0.001 | |
| 0.005 | 0.678 | 0.005 | 0.658 | 0.008 | 0.474 | |
| 0.037 | 0.051 | 0.035 | 0.070 | 0.035 | 0.069 | |
| 0.197 | 0.050 | 0.224 | 0.027 | 0.255 | 0.012 | |
| 0.000 | 0.993 | 0.010 | 0.846 | 0.018 | 0.736 | |
| −0.013 | 0.776 | −0.009 | 0.858 | −0.016 | 0.729 | |
| Industry and Year fixed effects | Included | Included | Included | |||
| Adj. | 0.406 | 0.397 | 0.407 | |||
| Difference in | F-test | |||||
| 0.091 | 5.09 | |||||
Notes:
Coefficient p-values in Panel A are two-tailed and robust standard errors are clustered by firm, following Peterson (2009). F-test p-values in Panel B are one-tailed. Refer to Appendix for variable definitions
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.