Conclusions, theoretical and managerial implications
| Conclusions | Theoretical and managerial implications |
|---|---|
| Customers consider not only pull (positive) factors of mobile payment but also push (negative) factors of cash payment |
|
| Behavioral intention is validated as the predictor of actual behavior |
|
| Conclusions | Theoretical and managerial implications |
|---|---|
| Customers consider not only pull (positive) factors of mobile payment but also push (negative) factors of cash payment | This study enhances the theory of behavioral intention to the continuance usage of m-payment by expanding UTAUT with the PPM model as the foundation of explanation. Four antecedent factors, namely, favorable attitude toward m-payment, social influence, facilitating conditions and unfavorable attitude toward cash payment, positively affect the continuance intention By incorporating the important elements simultaneously, both positive and negative factors, companies can formulate marketing strategies to encourage customers’ continuance usage of m-payments more effectively |
| Behavioral intention is validated as the predictor of actual behavior | The study corroborates the effect of continuance intention on the actual use of m-payment The m-payment service providers need to focus on the factors that significantly influence customers’ continuance intention to use m-payments as they finally influence the actual behavior |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.