Comparison of the three structural competing models
| Models | Labels | Model description | Terms of comparison | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model fit | Path coefficients | Tech. use explanatory power (R2 use) | Tech. engagement explanatory power (R2 engagement) | |||
| Model A | “Engagement-and-use” | Technology engagement and use as consequences/dependent variables | A > B>C | A > C>B | B > A>C | A > B>C |
| Model B | “Use-to-engagement” | Technology use precedes or is a prerequisite of technology use (use drives technology engagement) | ||||
| Model C | “Engagement-to-use” | Technology engagement precedes or is a prerequisite of technology use (engagement drives technology usage) | ||||
| Models | Labels | Model description | Terms of comparison | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model fit | Path coefficients | Tech. use explanatory power (R2 use) | Tech. engagement explanatory power (R2 engagement) | |||
| Model A | “Engagement-and-use” | Technology engagement and use as consequences/dependent variables | ||||
| Model B | “Use-to-engagement” | Technology use precedes or is a prerequisite of technology use (use drives technology engagement) | ||||
| Model C | “Engagement-to-use” | Technology engagement precedes or is a prerequisite of technology use (engagement drives technology usage) | ||||
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.