Opinion on introducing a unified CSR system
| It is a good idea: 62% | It is best left un-unified: 38% |
|---|---|
| It makes banks more committed and transparent All banks participate in CSR as a unit, which has greater effects on community development A unified system must be obligatory but have some flexibility It helps in achieving standardization instead of adopting a random policy | Difficult, as different banks have different priorities Unification could unintentionally lead to neglecting some important parts and needs of marginalized communities The power of CSR comes from its voluntary nature; making it compulsory will make it weaker |
| It is a good idea: 62% | It is best left un-unified: 38% |
|---|---|
| It makes banks more committed and transparent | Difficult, as different banks have different priorities |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.