Descriptive statistics of DEA efficiency scores – general sample
| Mean (%) | Median (%) | SD (%) | Min (%) | Max (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| European Union | ||||||
| Model 1 | 2018 | 10.57 | 8.62 | 10.21 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| 2017 | 12.77 | 10.90 | 9.83 | 0.00 | 100.00 | |
| 2016 | 10.78 | 8.98 | 9.65 | 0.06 | 100.00 | |
| 2015 | 11.27 | 9.27 | 9.78 | 0.05 | 100.00 | |
| 2014 | 11.50 | 9.60 | 9.55 | 0.09 | 100.00 | |
| 2013 | 10.05 | 8.35 | 8.87 | 0.22 | 100.00 | |
| Model 2 | 2018 | 9.23 | 7.94 | 6.94 | 0.00 | 83.42 |
| 2017 | 11.29 | 10.23 | 7.15 | 0.00 | 85.90 | |
| 2016 | 9.46 | 8.43 | 6.48 | 0.04 | 79.71 | |
| 2015 | 9.92 | 8.71 | 6.72 | 0.03 | 81.27 | |
| 2014 | 10.22 | 9.02 | 6.52 | 0.06 | 76.89 | |
| 2013 | 9.08 | 7.80 | 11.82 | 0.16 | 432.20 | |
| Eurozone | ||||||
| Model 1 | 2018 | 10.61 | 8.66 | 9.93 | 0.01 | 100.00 |
| 2017 | 13.18 | 11.58 | 9.59 | 0.00 | 100.00 | |
| 2016 | 10.67 | 8.98 | 9.51 | 0.08 | 100.00 | |
| 2015 | 11.11 | 9.22 | 9.66 | 0.05 | 100.00 | |
| 2014 | 11.31 | 9.56 | 9.45 | 0.09 | 100.00 | |
| 2013 | 9.94 | 8.30 | 8.96 | 0.22 | 100.00 | |
| Model 2 | 2018 | 9.41 | 8.00 | 6.89 | 0.00 | 84.04 |
| 2017 | 11.09 | 10.54 | 10.52 | 0.00 | 80.93 | |
| 2016 | 9.39 | 8.43 | 6.38 | 0.05 | 79.45 | |
| 2015 | 9.75 | 8.65 | 6.52 | 0.03 | 80.96 | |
| 2014 | 10.05 | 8.98 | 6.36 | 0.06 | 76.89 | |
| 2013 | 8.89 | 7.71 | 9.28 | 0.16 | 283.61 | |
| United States | ||||||
| Model 1 | 2018 | 36.04 | 31.84 | 15.58 | 1.61 | 100.00 |
| 2017 | 37.71 | 34.07 | 15.46 | 0.00 | 100.00 | |
| 2016 | 35.83 | 31.84 | 15.71 | 3.06 | 100.00 | |
| 2015 | 35.12 | 32.21 | 15.46 | 3.28 | 100.00 | |
| 2014 | 27.16 | 24.62 | 14.06 | 1.25 | 100.00 | |
| 2013 | 19.94 | 17.04 | 13.64 | 0.84 | 100.00 | |
| Mean (%) | Median (%) | SD (%) | Min (%) | Max (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | 2018 | 10.57 | 8.62 | 10.21 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| 2017 | 12.77 | 10.90 | 9.83 | 0.00 | 100.00 | |
| 2016 | 10.78 | 8.98 | 9.65 | 0.06 | 100.00 | |
| 2015 | 11.27 | 9.27 | 9.78 | 0.05 | 100.00 | |
| 2014 | 11.50 | 9.60 | 9.55 | 0.09 | 100.00 | |
| 2013 | 10.05 | 8.35 | 8.87 | 0.22 | 100.00 | |
| Model 2 | 2018 | 9.23 | 7.94 | 6.94 | 0.00 | 83.42 |
| 2017 | 11.29 | 10.23 | 7.15 | 0.00 | 85.90 | |
| 2016 | 9.46 | 8.43 | 6.48 | 0.04 | 79.71 | |
| 2015 | 9.92 | 8.71 | 6.72 | 0.03 | 81.27 | |
| 2014 | 10.22 | 9.02 | 6.52 | 0.06 | 76.89 | |
| 2013 | 9.08 | 7.80 | 11.82 | 0.16 | 432.20 | |
| Model 1 | 2018 | 10.61 | 8.66 | 9.93 | 0.01 | 100.00 |
| 2017 | 13.18 | 11.58 | 9.59 | 0.00 | 100.00 | |
| 2016 | 10.67 | 8.98 | 9.51 | 0.08 | 100.00 | |
| 2015 | 11.11 | 9.22 | 9.66 | 0.05 | 100.00 | |
| 2014 | 11.31 | 9.56 | 9.45 | 0.09 | 100.00 | |
| 2013 | 9.94 | 8.30 | 8.96 | 0.22 | 100.00 | |
| Model 2 | 2018 | 9.41 | 8.00 | 6.89 | 0.00 | 84.04 |
| 2017 | 11.09 | 10.54 | 10.52 | 0.00 | 80.93 | |
| 2016 | 9.39 | 8.43 | 6.38 | 0.05 | 79.45 | |
| 2015 | 9.75 | 8.65 | 6.52 | 0.03 | 80.96 | |
| 2014 | 10.05 | 8.98 | 6.36 | 0.06 | 76.89 | |
| 2013 | 8.89 | 7.71 | 9.28 | 0.16 | 283.61 | |
| Model 1 | 2018 | 36.04 | 31.84 | 15.58 | 1.61 | 100.00 |
| 2017 | 37.71 | 34.07 | 15.46 | 0.00 | 100.00 | |
| 2016 | 35.83 | 31.84 | 15.71 | 3.06 | 100.00 | |
| 2015 | 35.12 | 32.21 | 15.46 | 3.28 | 100.00 | |
| 2014 | 27.16 | 24.62 | 14.06 | 1.25 | 100.00 | |
| 2013 | 19.94 | 17.04 | 13.64 | 0.84 | 100.00 | |
Note(s): (1) The D.E.A. efficiency results of model 1 are generated using “rDEA” package version 4.47 in R software developed by Simm and Besstremyannaya (2016). (2) The dea efficiency results of model 2 are generated using the methodology of Simar and Wilson (2007), more specifically the algorithm 2 of the two-stage semi-parametric double bootstrapping method. (3) The size of confidence interval for the bias-corrected DEA score is 0.05
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.