Themes and main discussion areas that were emerged from the references
| Theme emerging from the SLR | Main discussion areas that were combined from the references | No. of sources | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adoption of IPD and BIM (Section 3.1) | Small–medium size enterprises, raising awareness, non-building projects, IPD and BIM as enablers, barriers, problems | 11 | Azhar (2011), Holzer (2011); Azhar et al. (2012), Chang et al. (2017); Fakhimi et al. (2017), Lam et al. (2017); Govender et al. (2018), Boon et al. (2019); Li et al. (2019), Piroozfar et al. (2019); Salleh et al. (2019) |
| Contractual models for project delivery (Section 3.2) | Legislation, alliance contracts, BIM partnering, framework arrangements, partnering, team integration, comparison of project delivery forms, design-bid-build, design-build, social capital, risk/reward compensation model, risks of IPD | 11 | Kim and Dossick (2011), Porwal and Hewage (2013); Zhang and Li (2014); Eadie et al. (2015), Franz et al. (2017); Albano and Di Giuda (2018), Ariffin et al. (2018); Bahram (2019), Salim and Mahjoob (2020); Zhang et al. (2020), Chen et al. (2020) |
| Cost management and finance (Section 3.3) | Cost estimation, profit distribution, activity-based costing, earned value management, 5 D BIM and integration with 4 D BIM, blockchain technology, change orders | 8 | Harrison and Thurnell (2015), Love et al. (2017); Ma et al. (2017), Teng et al. (2019); Elghaish et al. (2019; 2020a, 2020b); Elghaish and Abrishami (2020a) |
| Sustainability (Section 3.4) | OptEEmAL, IPD and BIM as sustainability tools, sustainable building design, sustainable socio-cultural benefits of IPD and BIM | 7 | Bynum et al. (2013), Wong and Fan (2013); Oduyemi et al. (2017), Cohen and Snell (2018); Ma et al. (2018b); Maskil-Leitan and Reychav (2018); García-Fuentes et al. (2019) |
| Technology (Section 3.5) | IPD as BIM's eventual goal, KanBIM quality control system, model-driven software engineering | 7 | Isikdag (2012), Goulding et al. (2014); Hiyama et al. (2014), Monteiro et al. (2014); Liu and Shiv (2017); Götz et al. (2020); Keskin et al. (2020) |
| Collaboration (Section 3.6) | Collaboration platform, knowledge exchange, intensive Big Room, drivers of collaborative behavior, rent-seeking behavior, motivations for hazard behavior, incentive payments/penalties | 6 | Alhava et al. (2015), Ma and Ma (2017); Mei et al. (2017), Staykova and Underwood (2017); Ma et al. (2018a); Du et al. (2019) |
| Increasing the competence level of staff in the AEC industry (Section 3.7) | Incorporating IPD and BIM in the AEC curriculum, pilot programs, construction collaboration process | 5 | Forgues and Becerik-Gerber (2013), MacDonald and Mills (2013); Solnosky et al. (2014, 2015); Jin et al. (2020) |
| Supply chain integration (Section 3.8) | Supply chain partnership, types of supply chain partnering, prefabrication, off-site construction | 5 | Papadonikolaki et al. (2016), Li et al. (2017); Papadonikolaki and Wamelink (2017), Hall et al. (2018); Jin et al. (2018) |
| Early integration (Section 3.9) | Facilities management, fragmentation, integration of construction in design, BIM as a catalyst, early involvement | 4 | Nawi et al. (2014), Mayo and Issa (2016); Olatunji and Akanmu (2015), Pishdad-Bozorgi et al. (2018) |
| Scheduling (Section 3.10) | Four-dimensional BIM, delay, activity-based costing, scheduling and cost performance of IPD coupled with BIM and lean construction | 4 | Umar et al. (2015), Nguyen and Akhavian (2019); Sepasgozar et al. (2019); Elghaish and Abrishami (2020b) |
| Transformation (Section 3.11) | Industrial transformation, liminal roles, exemplar projects | 3 | Kraatz et al. (2014), Rowlinson (2017); Gustavsson (2018) |
| Theme emerging | Main discussion areas | No. of sources | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adoption of IPD and BIM (Section 3.1) | Small–medium size enterprises, raising awareness, non-building projects, IPD and BIM as enablers, barriers, problems | 11 | |
| Contractual models for project delivery (Section 3.2) | Legislation, alliance contracts, BIM partnering, framework arrangements, partnering, team integration, comparison of project delivery forms, design-bid-build, design-build, social capital, risk/reward compensation model, risks of IPD | 11 | |
| Cost management and finance (Section 3.3) | Cost estimation, profit distribution, activity-based costing, earned value management, 5 D BIM and integration with 4 D BIM, blockchain technology, change orders | 8 | |
| Sustainability (Section 3.4) | OptEEmAL, IPD and BIM as sustainability tools, sustainable building design, sustainable socio-cultural benefits of IPD and BIM | 7 | |
| Technology (Section 3.5) | IPD as BIM's eventual goal, KanBIM quality control system, model-driven software engineering | 7 | |
| Collaboration (Section 3.6) | Collaboration platform, knowledge exchange, intensive Big Room, drivers of collaborative behavior, rent-seeking behavior, motivations for hazard behavior, incentive payments/penalties | 6 | |
| Increasing the competence level of staff in the AEC industry | Incorporating IPD and BIM in the AEC curriculum, pilot programs, construction collaboration process | 5 | |
| Supply chain integration | Supply chain partnership, types of supply chain partnering, prefabrication, off-site construction | 5 | |
| Early integration | Facilities management, fragmentation, integration of construction in design, BIM as a catalyst, early involvement | 4 | |
| Scheduling (Section 3.10) | Four-dimensional BIM, delay, activity-based costing, scheduling and cost performance of IPD coupled with BIM and lean construction | 4 | |
| Transformation (Section 3.11) | Industrial transformation, liminal roles, exemplar projects | 3 |