Proposed guidelines for developing and implementing a multidisciplinary online learning environment
| Factors1 | Guidelines |
|---|---|
| 1. Self-directed/self-paced learning1 |
|
| |
| 2. Individualized, based on learner's profile and background1 |
|
| 3. Interactive1 |
|
| 4. Multimodal1 |
|
| 5. Flexibility1 |
|
| |
| 6. Accessible1 |
|
| 7. Consistency of information, repetition, and reinforcement1 |
|
| 8. Cost-effective and good value for investment both for the learner and system1 |
|
| 9. Measures using questionnaires/feedback/surveys of satisfaction1 |
|
| |
| |
| Example: Student placement quality surveys, peer observation, ad hoc feedback and internal sources such as the Australian Rural Health Education Network Survey | |
| 10. Provides equitable engagement1 |
|
| 11. Access to the lecturer who facilitates the program1 |
|
| 12. Nurtures critical thinking, reflection and applicability1 |
|
| Example: The School Hand Hygiene Project | |
| 13. Establishment of a learning community1 |
|
| 14. Ability for translation into practice1 |
|
| |
| Example, the impact of COVID-19 on older people and social isolation | |
| 15. Multidisciplinary expertise |
|
| |
| 16. Multidisciplinary learning |
|
| |
| 16. Good facilitation skills |
|
| 17. Cyber security |
|
| |
| |
| 18. Organizational support structures |
|
| 19. Strong partnerships |
|
| |
| |
| 20. Health needs of the community |
|
|
| Factors1 | Guidelines |
|---|---|
| 1. Self-directed/self-paced learning1 | Students are self-directed through completing and leading multidisciplinary case discussions at their own pace and within set timeframes |
Students choose their own integrated care topics and develop and complete multidisciplinary team-based projects at their own pace within a set timeframe | |
| 2. Individualized, based on learner's profile and background1 | Students present patient-based student-led case discussions from the perspective of their own discipline to students from other disciplines |
| 3. Interactive1 | An online collaboration platform allows the multidisciplinary education program to be interactive. Students can ask questions or use the chat functions |
| 4. Multimodal1 | Students read various types of resources, watch videos, attend online meetings and write reflections on their own work based on other students' feedback |
| 5. Flexibility1 | Students pick a topic that interests them to increase engagement |
Students can jump into real-time multidisciplinary learning sessions or watch the recordings later | |
| 6. Accessible1 | Students can participate no matter where they are located |
| 7. Consistency of information, repetition, and reinforcement1 | Learning is repeated and reinforced through the following processes: (1) Students are informed about national policies or policy directives (information-transfer), (2) students are asked to complete a project in relation to the national policies or directives, (3) students present their project back to other students and receive feedback, (4) students incorporate feedback from their peers and write a 500-word reflection on their learnings |
| 8. Cost-effective and good value for investment both for the learner and system1 | The online program allows for increased efficiencies. Consider new partnerships so that the program can be expanded to other rural or urban areas and promote multidisciplinary learning at new universities |
| 9. Measures using questionnaires/feedback/surveys of satisfaction1 | At the end of their placement students complete a survey that will assist in further improving the program |
Identify existing data sources to ensure formal feedback about the education program from internal and external sources | |
Identify informal feedback from students, peers, university partners and the community partners about the program | |
| 10. Provides equitable engagement1 | Students from anywhere can participate |
| 11. Access to the lecturer who facilitates the program1 | An academic lecturer facilitates the program. Students can access the lecturer to ask questions online, email and face-to-face |
| 12. Nurtures critical thinking, reflection and applicability1 | Use real-world applications to allow critical thinking about multidisciplinary learning and reflect on the effect on (rural) communities |
| 13. Establishment of a learning community1 | Debrief sessions and multidisciplinary project team-based learning creates a sense of a learning community among students from different disciplines |
| 14. Ability for translation into practice1 | Projects are marked on application to (rural) practice and are based on real-world problems. This assists students to think of system-based as well as individual patient-level solutions |
Community partners join online sessions to provide real-world context | |
| 15. Multidisciplinary expertise | Multidisciplinary facilitators require in-depth knowledge of a wide range of disciplines and health systems to allow students to communicate across various disciplines and understand integrated care solutions |
The expert has adaptive expertise, whereby the expert is able to distill the complexity of integrated care through continually refining and increasingly sharing patient and system complexity with the students based on their expertise | |
| 16. Multidisciplinary learning | Students identify the top three health priority issues in an area based on local needs assessments |
Students identify which interventions are implemented in their placements to improve the priority health issues | |
| 16. Good facilitation skills | Multidisciplinary facilitators need to have good facilitation skills |
| 17. Cyber security | Online meetings are recorded in accordance with university policies |
Recordings are saved to a local drive, not a USB or external hard drive, which is nominated in the online platform recording settings | |
The local drive is encrypted. The recording is moved to an approved data storage platform and deleted from the local drive | |
| 18. Organizational support structures | Strong administrative and IT support structures are in place to ensure seamless integration of online education |
| 19. Strong partnerships | Have strong partnerships with a variety of community-based organizations |
Have strong partnerships with clinicians from multiple disciplines | |
Have strong partnerships with multiple universities | |
| 20. Health needs of the community | Provide resources on the health needs of the community |
Ensure students share their knowledge and skills to solve the community needs across disciplines |
Source(s): 1Moehead et al. (2020)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.