Table I

Emergent taxonomy of commensuration management tactics

Positional status emerging from performance evaluationFoci of commensuration management tactics
Comparison objectComparison dimensionComparison rate

Winners (high-status group)

1. Mobilize PE to signal group membership

- Inclusion of high-status members in in-group

- Minimization of in-group

5. Legitimize comparison dimension

- Explicit support of comparison dimension

9. Emphasize significance of rate

- Results amplification

2. Mobilize PE to signal group non-membership

- Exclusion of low-status members from in-group

- Maximization of out-group

6. Fact fabrication

- Ambiguity reduction

- Selective verification

10. Selective justification of rate

- Stress proactivity

- Relate to core organizational strengths

Losers (low-status group)

3. Mobilize PE to signal group membership

- Inclusion of high-status members in in-group

- Maximization of in-group

7. De-emphasize comparison dimension

- Deflect attention through highlighting alternative comparison dimension(s)

11. De-emphasize significance of rate

- Results relativizing

4 . Mobilize PE to signal group non-membership

- Exclusion of low-status members from in-group

8. Fact problematization

- Ambiguity enhancement

- Selective comparison

12. Selective justification of rate

- Stress exceptionality

Note: PE, performance evaluation

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal