Table 2 Contextual issues derived from... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2

Contextual issues derived from the literature survey

Factor category	Contextual issues	Authors
Personal factors	1. Confidence level of completing online learning materials 2. Matching level of learning expectation and availability 3. Degree of reachability to subject experts 4. Individual technical know-how 5. Supporting level of technical team 6. Strength of interpersonal interactiveness 7. Degree of privacy concerns 8. Influence level of adult pride 9. Compatibility with individual learning style 10. Rate of responding of supporting staff 11. Awareness of e-content availability 12. Awareness of utilizing LMS 13. Physical/mental health concerns	Regmi and Jones (2020) Oluyinka and Endozo (2019), Sarker et al. (2019) Akhter et al. (2022) Roslan and Halim (2021) Sophonhiranrak (2021), Ali et al. (2021) Rawashdeh et al. (2021) O'Doherty et al. (2018) Kamble et al. (2021) Kurowski et al. (2022) Banks and Dohy (2019) Chatti and Hadoussa (2021)
Technological factors	1. Speed of connectivity 2. Convenience of accessibility 3. Quality of the LMS	Almaiah and Al Mulhem (2019), Al-Araibi et al. (2019), Martin and Kumar (2021)
Organizational factors	1. Level of superior encouragement 2. Level of support from coworkers 3. Level of interactivity of e-contents 4. Rate of grasping the knowledge	Almaiah and Alyoussef (2019) Regmi and Jones (2020) Oluyinka and Endozo (2019), Akhter et al. (2022)
Time-intensive factor	1. Degree of personal/official commitments 2. Frequency of external interruptions 3. Efficiency of time management	O'Doherty et al. (2018), ValverdeBerrocoso et al. (2020)

Factor category	Contextual issues	Authors
Personal factors	1. Confidence level of completing online learning materials2. Matching level of learning expectation and availability3. Degree of reachability to subject experts4. Individual technical know-how5. Supporting level of technical team6. Strength of interpersonal interactiveness7. Degree of privacy concerns8. Influence level of adult pride9. Compatibility with individual learning style10. Rate of responding of supporting staff11. Awareness of e-content availability12. Awareness of utilizing LMS13. Physical/mental health concerns	Regmi and Jones (2020)Oluyinka and Endozo (2019), Sarker et al. (2019)Akhter et al. (2022)Roslan and Halim (2021)Sophonhiranrak (2021), Ali et al. (2021)Rawashdeh et al. (2021)O'Doherty et al. (2018)Kamble et al. (2021)Kurowski et al. (2022)Banks and Dohy (2019)Chatti and Hadoussa (2021)
Technological factors	1. Speed of connectivity2. Convenience of accessibility3. Quality of the LMS	Almaiah and Al Mulhem (2019), Al-Araibi et al. (2019), Martin and Kumar (2021)
Organizational factors	1. Level of superior encouragement2. Level of support from coworkers3. Level of interactivity of e-contents4. Rate of grasping the knowledge	Almaiah and Alyoussef (2019)Regmi and Jones (2020)Oluyinka and Endozo (2019), Akhter et al. (2022)
Time-intensive factor	1. Degree of personal/official commitments2. Frequency of external interruptions3. Efficiency of time management	O'Doherty et al. (2018), ValverdeBerrocoso et al. (2020)