Table 4

Factors influencing the adoption of SMA techniques

StudyCountry (sample size)Theory appliedSMA techniques consideredFactors consideredFindings
Developed economies
Guilding (1999) New Zealand (112 largest public and private companies)Contingency theoryCompetitor cost assessment
Competitive position monitoring
Competitor performance appraisal
Strategic costing
Strategic pricing
Strategic mission
Competitive strategy
Company size
Industry
Companies pursuing “build” strategic mission adopts strategic pricing and strategic costing techniques
The usage rates of competitor cost assessment, competitive position monitoring and competitor performance appraisal are higher in “prospector” companies
The usage rates of all the SMA techniques, except strategic pricing, are higher in larger companies
Industry variations do not affect the usage rates except for competitor cost assessment in Oil, gas, mineral and electricity industry
Cravens and Guilding (2001) USA (120)Contingency theory15 SMA techniques (ABC, attribute costing, brand valuation, competitor cost assessment, competitive position monitoring, competitor performance appraisal, life cycle costing, quality costing, strategic costing, strategic pricing, target costing and value chain costing, benchmarking and IPM)Eight subdimensions of competitive strategy (R&D, product quality, product technology, product range, service quality, price level, adverting expenditure level and market coverage)SMA usage rate is higher in companies pursuing “Research and Development” and “Broad market coverage” strategy
Guilding and McManus (2002) Australia (124 top listed companies, measured in terms of market capitalization)Contingency theoryCustomer accounting
Customer segment profitability analysis
Customer profitability analysis
Lifetime customer profitability analysis
Valuation of customers as asset
Intensity of competition
Market orientation
Company size
Customer accounting, lifetime customer profitability analysis and valuation of customers as asset are positively associated with market orientation
Intensity of competition is positively associated only with customer segment profitability analysis
Company size is positively associated only with customer accounting
Cinquini and Tenucci (2007) Italy (92 largest manufacturing companies)Contingency theory14 SMA techniques (ABC/M, attribute costing, competitor cost assessment, competitive position monitoring, competitor performance appraisal, customer accounting, life cycle costing, quality costing, target costing, value chain costing, strategic costing, strategic pricing,benchmarking and IPM/BSC)Strategic pattern
Strategic mission
Strategic positioning
Company size
Industry
The usage of target costing is positively associated with strategic mission (build)
The usage of life cycle costing, strategic costing, ABC/M and value chain costing is greater in companies pursuing “cost leaders” strategy
The usage of competitor cost assessment and strategic pricing is negatively associated with company size
The association between SMA usage and types of industry is diversified
Cadez and Guilding (2008) Slovenia (193 largest companies, in terms of total revenue)Contingency theory16 SMA techniques (attribute costing, brand valuation, competitor cost assessment, competitive position monitoring, competitor performance appraisal, life cycle costing, quality costing, strategic costing, strategic pricing, target costing and value chain costing, benchmarking and IPM, customer profitability analysis, lifetime customer profitability analysis and valuation of customers as assets)Business strategy (prospector/defender)
Deliberate strategy formulation
Market orientation
Company size
SMA usage is positively associated with adopting a prospector strategy, deliberate strategy formulation, company size and accountants' participation in strategic decision-making
Cinquini and Tenucci (2010) Italy (92 largest manufacturing companies)Contingency theory11 SMA techniques (ABC/M, competitor cost assessment, competitive position monitoring, competitor performance appraisal, customer accounting, life cycle costing, quality costing, target costing and value chain costing, benchmarking and IPM/BSC)Strategic pattern
Strategic mission
Strategic positioning
Company size
Costing-oriented SMA usage rates are higher in “defenders” than in “prospectors”
Customer-oriented SMA usage rate is higher in companies pursuing “build” strategic mission
Costing-oriented SMA usage rates are higher in “cost leaders” than in “differentiators”
Weak association between company size and SMA usage
Lachmann et al. (2013) Germany (116 hospitals)Strategic management11 SMA techniques based on Guilding et al. (2000) Structural characteristics (size, ownership and legal form)The use of SMA techniques varies among hospitals based on their structural characteristics
Nuhu et al. (2017) Australia (127 public sector organizations)Contingency theory8 (of which 5 are SMA techniques as per the scope of this study) (ABC, benchmarking, BSC, value chain analysis, strategic cost management)Interactive use and diagnostic use of MCSSMA usage is positively associated with interactive and diagnostic use of MCS
Pavlatos and Kostakis (2018) Greece (94 manufacturing companies)Upper echelons theory and role theory8 SMA techniques (Attribute costing, competitor cost assessment, competitor performance appraisal, customer profitability analysis, strategic pricing, brand valuation, value analysis and benchmarking)Historical financial performance
Top management team (TMT) age
TMT tenure
TMT educational background
TMT creativity
Economic crisis' perception
Perceived environmental uncertainty
Firms with low profitability in the past (arising due to economic crisis) use SMA techniques more extensively
SMA usage is positively associated with TMT educational background and creativity
SMA usage is negatively associated with TMT tenure of service
Pasch (2019) Austria (72) Germany (283) Switzerland (22)
Total (377)
Contingency theory10 SMA techniques (ABC, brand valuation, CPM, target costing, LCC, value chain costing, benchmarking, IPM, CPA, LTCPA)Stages of firm life cycle, firm size, interdependence, degree of centralization and product qualityFirms in the maturity, revival and growth stages are more likely to use SMA techniques. Firm size, product quality and interdependence are also positively associated with SMA usage
Cescon et al. (2019) Italy (55 large manufacturing companies)Contingency theory11 SMA techniques (attribute costing, brand valuation, CCA, CPM, CPAFS, target costing, LCC, value chain costing, benchmarking, BSC, strategic pricing)Strategy type, geographic orientation, and environmental uncertainty and competitive forcesNational firms adopting differentiation strategy make greater use of brand valuation. SMA usage is also positively associated with environmental uncertainty and competitive forces
Developing economies
Amanollah Nejad Kalkhouran et al. (2017) Malaysia (121 SMEs)Contingency theory and upper echelons theory16 SMA techniques of Cadez and Guilding (2008) plus value stream costing and customer segment profitability analysisCEO education
CEO experience
Involvement in networks
SMA usage is positively associated with CEO education and involvement in network
Arunruangsirilert and Chonglerttham (2017) Thailand (103)Agency, resource dependency, and stewardship theory16 SMA techniques based on Cadez and Guilding (2008) CEO duality, board independence, board size, board meeting, audit committee independence and meeting, size, leverage, strategy typeSeparation of CEO role from chairman, board independence, and frequency of audit committee meetings are positively associated with SMA usage, whereas independent chairmen and board size negatively associated with SMA usage

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options