Table 7

Robustness regression test

Dependent variable: DLLP
Method: Robust least squares
Sample 1: 226
Included observations: 226
VariablePred. SignCoefficientStd. Errort-statisticProbRemarks
C −0.09570.0160−5.76580.0000 
EBTP+1.11410.22004.86700.0000Accepted
LDR−−0.05280.0208−2.43940.0147Accepted
BOPO+0.10920.01457.25560.0000Accepted
CG*EBTP−−0.27460.3730−0.70770.4791Rejected
CG*LDR+0.07640.03292.22830.0259Accepted
CG*BOPO−−0.06220.0264−2.26550.0235Accepted
CAR+0.01590.00941.62210.1048 
NIM+0.00080.00900.08080.9356 
SIZE+0.00040.00050.92130.3569 
R-squared0.4618Mean dependent var0.0011
Adjusted R-squared0.7506S.D. dependent var0.0160
S.E. of regression0.0080Akaike info criterion−6.7729
Sum squared residual0.0139Schwarz criterion−6.6216
Log likelihood775.3391Hannan–Quinn criteria−6.7118
F-statistic76.2377Durbin–Watson stat1.3661
Prob(F-statistic)0.0000   

Note(s): *Significant p-value < 0.05; EBTP: Pre-managed earnings; LDR: Liquidity; BOPO: Efficiency; CG: Governance Mechanisms; CAR: Capital Adequacy Ratio; NIM: Net Interest Margin; SIZE: Bank Size; prediction signs have a correlation with DLLP, if it is concluded in earnings quality has the opposite interpretation

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options