Table 2.

Descriptive statistics

VariablesROICROEROAEPSESGESGβFirm
leverage
Firm
size
Unsystematic
risk
Moder_ESG_
Fsize
Moder_ENV_
Fsize
Moder_SOC_
Fsize
Moder_
GOV_Fsize
Valid (N)152152152152152152152152152152152152152152152152
Missing0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
Mean2.6223.3741.3743.12348.85942.46751.83550.2090.831295.42925.4180.3350.3070.3790.2640.191
Median2.8253.4891.4892.90748.99242.17351.84350.5370.834132.09325.1310.335−0.0040.0080.000−0.008
Std. Deviation0.5971.1200.5061.33114.83324.83615.33016.5760.333379.6541.8110.2011.0311.1040.9030.982
Skewness−0.6400.2380.4510.6300.0370.071−0.2870.0791.3582.4120.5720.3272.0131.4721.8592.055
Kurtosis1.5710.7281.2260.2820.614−0.8200.6060.5355.8866.9870.160−0.5293.2901.3663.6135.521
Minimum0.4470.3000.2000.4453.8300.0002.1877.0870.2051.04820.2200.008−1.219−1.244−1.346−1.705
Maximum4.2186.5393.3146.82285.64289.52584.43991.4552.5832070.44629.4120.8233.8013.9703.5714.028

Notes:

As shown in Table 2, the average ESG score of our sample firms is 48.859, which breaks down as 42.467 for EP, 51.835 for SP and 50.209 for corporate GP for 2015–2019. Nordic financial firms show higher scores for social and corporate GP than for EP. This is further confirmed with the high standard deviation compared to its peer variables S and G. Skewness and kurtosis show that the data of dependent variables are normally distributed, which is critical when running the FE regression. Furthermore, FP indicates a mean (median) of 2.622 (2.825) for ROIC, 3.374 (3.489) for ROE, 1.374 (1.489) for ROA and 3.123 (2.907) for EPS

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal