Stock liquidity and the accrual anomaly
| Panel A: The regression approach | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable: RETt+1 | ||||
| Variable | Coeff. | t-stat | Coeff. | t-stat |
| MCt | −0.015** | −7.73 | −0.011** | −4.67 |
| B/Mt | 0.051** | 10.72 | 0.052** | 10.87 |
| MOMt | −0.037** | −5.54 | −0.038** | −5.63 |
| D_NSt | −0.026** | −2.93 | −0.029** | −3.19 |
| NSt | −0.096** | −5.38 | −0.096** | −5.38 |
| dA/At | −0.101** | −5.61 | −0.100** | −5.54 |
| D_Y/Bt | 0.017† | 1.82 | 0.014 | 1.53 |
| Y/B(+)t | 0.254** | 4.52 | 0.263** | 4.66 |
| ACCt | −0.196** | −7.66 | −0.176** | −7.28 |
| LIQ_HLt | −0.016** | −3.17 | ||
| ACCt × LIQ_HLt | 0.066** | 3.01 | ||
| Year fixed effects | Yes | Yes | ||
| Industry fixed effects | Yes | Yes | ||
| N | 79,994 | 79,994 | ||
| R2 | 0.121 | 0.121 | ||
| Panel A: The regression approach | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable: | ||||
| Variable | Coeff. | Coeff. | ||
| −0.015** | −7.73 | −0.011** | −4.67 | |
| 0.051** | 10.72 | 0.052** | 10.87 | |
| −0.037** | −5.54 | −0.038** | −5.63 | |
| −0.026** | −2.93 | −0.029** | −3.19 | |
| −0.096** | −5.38 | −0.096** | −5.38 | |
| −0.101** | −5.61 | −0.100** | −5.54 | |
| 0.017† | 1.82 | 0.014 | 1.53 | |
| 0.254** | 4.52 | 0.263** | 4.66 | |
| −0.196** | −7.66 | −0.176** | −7.28 | |
| −0.016** | −3.17 | |||
| 0.066** | 3.01 | |||
| Year fixed effects | Yes | Yes | ||
| Industry fixed effects | Yes | Yes | ||
| 79,994 | 79,994 | |||
| 0.121 | 0.121 | |||
| Panel B: The sorts approach | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals (ACCt) | Mean of equal-weighted ARETt+1 | t-stat | ||||||
| (MEWARET) | ||||||||
| Liquidity (LIQ_HLt) | Liquidity (LIQ_HLt) | |||||||
| L | 2 | 3 | H | L | 2 | 3 | H | |
| Low – accruals | 15.68 | 3.53 | 2.89 | 2.95 | 3.31 | 1.98 | 1.50 | 1.72 |
| 2 | 12.23 | 5.92 | 4.76 | 3.58 | 3.12 | 4.05 | 3.94 | 3.66 |
| 3 | 7.45 | 1.36 | 3.84 | 0.75 | 2.81 | 1.18 | 2.97 | 0.67 |
| 4 | 6.86 | 2.06 | 2.00 | 0.46 | 2.46 | 1.49 | 2.20 | 0.57 |
| 5 | 5.70 | 3.33 | 1.92 | 0.42 | 2.57 | 2.32 | 1.57 | 0.39 |
| 6 | 4.56 | −0.22 | 0.15 | −0.32 | 1.30 | −0.15 | 0.18 | −0.31 |
| 7 | 2.24 | −1.96 | −0.74 | −1.34 | 0.73 | −1.48 | −0.63 | −1.37 |
| 8 | 0.18 | −3.02 | −1.75 | −1.53 | 0.07 | −2.09 | −1.73 | −1.39 |
| 9 | −0.56 | −2.20 | −3.24 | −2.55 | −0.24 | −1.36 | −2.90 | −2.29 |
| High – accruals | −4.05 | −7.89 | −5.80 | −3.77 | −1.77 | −3.20 | −3.78 | −2.13 |
| L−H | 19.73 | 11.42 | 8.69 | 6.72 | 3.75 | 3.76 | 3.53 | 2.72 |
| Mean of Absolute MEWARET | SD of Absolute MEWARET | |||||||
| 5.95 | 3.15 | 2.71 | 1.76 | 4.93 | 2.25 | 1.76 | 1.34 | |
| Panel B: The sorts approach | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals ( | Mean of equal-weighted | |||||||
| ( | ||||||||
| Liquidity ( | Liquidity ( | |||||||
| L | 2 | 3 | H | L | 2 | 3 | H | |
| Low – accruals | 15.68 | 3.53 | 2.89 | 2.95 | 3.31 | 1.98 | 1.50 | 1.72 |
| 2 | 12.23 | 5.92 | 4.76 | 3.58 | 3.12 | 4.05 | 3.94 | 3.66 |
| 3 | 7.45 | 1.36 | 3.84 | 0.75 | 2.81 | 1.18 | 2.97 | 0.67 |
| 4 | 6.86 | 2.06 | 2.00 | 0.46 | 2.46 | 1.49 | 2.20 | 0.57 |
| 5 | 5.70 | 3.33 | 1.92 | 0.42 | 2.57 | 2.32 | 1.57 | 0.39 |
| 6 | 4.56 | −0.22 | 0.15 | −0.32 | 1.30 | −0.15 | 0.18 | −0.31 |
| 7 | 2.24 | −1.96 | −0.74 | −1.34 | 0.73 | −1.48 | −0.63 | −1.37 |
| 8 | 0.18 | −3.02 | −1.75 | −1.53 | 0.07 | −2.09 | −1.73 | −1.39 |
| 9 | −0.56 | −2.20 | −3.24 | −2.55 | −0.24 | −1.36 | −2.90 | −2.29 |
| High – accruals | −4.05 | −7.89 | −5.80 | −3.77 | −1.77 | −3.20 | −3.78 | −2.13 |
| L−H | 19.73 | 11.42 | 8.69 | 6.72 | 3.75 | 3.76 | 3.53 | 2.72 |
| Mean of Absolute | SD of Absolute | |||||||
| 5.95 | 3.15 | 2.71 | 1.76 | 4.93 | 2.25 | 1.76 | 1.34 | |
| Panel C: The alpha approach | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals (ACCt) | αp | t-stat | ||||||
| Liquidity (LIQ_HLt) | Liquidity (LIQ_HLt) | |||||||
| L | 2 | 3 | H | L | 2 | 3 | H | |
| Low – accruals | 1.68 | 0.67 | 0.49 | 0.21 | 6.64 | 4.10 | 3.62 | 1.83 |
| 2 | 1.30 | 0.65 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 5.03 | 3.84 | 4.66 | 4.79 |
| 3 | 1.06 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.28 | 4.97 | 2.98 | 4.94 | 4.12 |
| 4 | 0.85 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.21 | 4.15 | 3.14 | 3.57 | 2.79 |
| 5 | 0.81 | 0.40 | 0.28 | 0.20 | 3.94 | 3.70 | 2.91 | 2.81 |
| 6 | 0.48 | 0.25 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 2.38 | 2.12 | 1.61 | 0.87 |
| 7 | 0.43 | 0.14 | 0.05 | −0.04 | 2.28 | 1.18 | 0.55 | −0.42 |
| 8 | 0.36 | 0.00 | −0.05 | −0.09 | 1.72 | 0.03 | −0.50 | −0.88 |
| 9 | 0.19 | −0.10 | −0.29 | −0.18 | 0.86 | −0.66 | −2.77 | −1.74 |
| High – accruals | −0.19 | −0.66 | −0.54 | −0.31 | −0.61 | −3.51 | −3.98 | −2.14 |
| αL−αH | 1.87 | 1.33 | 1.03 | 0.52 | 4.67 | 5.34 | 5.37 | 2.81 |
| Mean of Absolute αp | SD of Absolute αp | |||||||
| 0.73 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.20 | 0.50 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.12 | |
| Panel C: The alpha approach | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals ( | ||||||||
| Liquidity ( | Liquidity ( | |||||||
| L | 2 | 3 | H | L | 2 | 3 | H | |
| Low – accruals | 1.68 | 0.67 | 0.49 | 0.21 | 6.64 | 4.10 | 3.62 | 1.83 |
| 2 | 1.30 | 0.65 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 5.03 | 3.84 | 4.66 | 4.79 |
| 3 | 1.06 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.28 | 4.97 | 2.98 | 4.94 | 4.12 |
| 4 | 0.85 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.21 | 4.15 | 3.14 | 3.57 | 2.79 |
| 5 | 0.81 | 0.40 | 0.28 | 0.20 | 3.94 | 3.70 | 2.91 | 2.81 |
| 6 | 0.48 | 0.25 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 2.38 | 2.12 | 1.61 | 0.87 |
| 7 | 0.43 | 0.14 | 0.05 | −0.04 | 2.28 | 1.18 | 0.55 | −0.42 |
| 8 | 0.36 | 0.00 | −0.05 | −0.09 | 1.72 | 0.03 | −0.50 | −0.88 |
| 9 | 0.19 | −0.10 | −0.29 | −0.18 | 0.86 | −0.66 | −2.77 | −1.74 |
| High – accruals | −0.19 | −0.66 | −0.54 | −0.31 | −0.61 | −3.51 | −3.98 | −2.14 |
| 1.87 | 1.33 | 1.03 | 0.52 | 4.67 | 5.34 | 5.37 | 2.81 | |
| Mean of Absolute | SD of Absolute | |||||||
| 0.73 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.20 | 0.50 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.12 | |
Note(s): This table reports results from the regression, the sorts, and the alpha approaches to testing the effect of stock liquidity on the relation between accruals and future stock returns. Panel A reports results from the regression approach. The regression model extends the one used in Fama and French (2008) by including industry and year fixed effects, stock liquidity and the interaction term between stock liquidity and accruals. In Panel A, t-statistics are calculated by using cluster-robust standard errors clustered on firms. Panel B reports results from the sorts approach. ARETt+1 is the abnormal annual stock return that cumulates over a 12-month period starting from the fourth month after the end of fiscal year t. To compute ARETt+1 we follow the characteristic-based portfolio matching procedure proposed in Daniel et al. (1997) to adjust annual stock returns. MEWARET is the equal-weighted average of abnormal annual stock returns. Panel C reports results from the alpha approach. In Panel C, t-statistics are calculated by using standard errors adjusted for Newey–West autocorrelations of three lags
**, *, and † denote statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively, using a 2-tailed test
As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.
Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.
Please sign in to your personal account to gift article access.
As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.
Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.
Gift articles remaining: --
Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.
Gift articles remaining: --
As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.
Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses.
You have reached the limit of 10 links within a 30 day period.
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.