Mediation analysis of perceived pride in the effect of the intervention on vegetable consumption and liking
| X→Y (c path)a | X→Y (c′ path) | X→M (a path) | M→Y (b path) | Indirect effect (a+b path) | Sobel test | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome variables | B (SE) | p-value | B (SE) | p-value | B (SE) | p-value | B (SE) | p-value | B (SE) | CI 95% | z | p-value |
| Total vegetable consumption | 3.18 (2.82) | 0.26 | 3.08 (2.83) | 0.28 | 0.04 (0.11) | 0.67 | 2.13 (2.94) | 0.47 | 0.10 (0.44) | (−0.20, 1.23) | 0.23 | 0.81 |
| Overall vegetable liking | −0.21 (0.32) | 0.52 | −0.22 (0.32) | 0.50 | 0.04 (0.11) | 0.67 | 0.27 (0.33) | 0.41 | 0.01 (0.06) | (−0.05, 0.20) | 0.26 | 0.80 |
| X→Y (c path)a | X→Y (c′ path) | X→M (a path) | M→Y (b path) | Indirect effect (a+b path) | Sobel test | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome variables | CI 95% | |||||||||||
| Total vegetable consumption | 3.18 (2.82) | 0.26 | 3.08 (2.83) | 0.28 | 0.04 (0.11) | 0.67 | 2.13 (2.94) | 0.47 | 0.10 (0.44) | (−0.20, 1.23) | 0.23 | 0.81 |
| Overall vegetable liking | −0.21 (0.32) | 0.52 | −0.22 (0.32) | 0.50 | 0.04 (0.11) | 0.67 | 0.27 (0.33) | 0.41 | 0.01 (0.06) | (−0.05, 0.20) | 0.26 | 0.80 |
Note: aEffect of the intervention without mediator