Regression analysis results
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | VIFs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | |||||
| Firm industrya | −0.105 (−0.411) | −0.128 (−0.398) | 0.128 (0.540) | 0.129 (0.287) | 1.114 |
| Firm sizeb | 0.126 (0.637) | −0.118 (−0.104) | 0.127 (0.220) | 0.102 (0.128) | 1.336 |
| Firm agec | −0.077 (−1.82) | −0.102 (−1.655) | −0.067 (−1.26) | −0.062 (−1.14) | 1.429 |
| Strategic planning (SP) | 0.476 (6.810)** | 0.414 (6.138)** | 0.420 (6.333)** | 1.096 | |
| Market dynamism (MD) | 0.047 (0.774) | 0.049 (0.810) | 1.124 | ||
| Strategic planning × market dynamism | 0.128 (2.771)** | 1.022 | |||
| R2 | 0.178 | 0.325 | 0.348 | 0.499 | |
| ΔR2 | 0.178 | 0.147 | 0.023 | 0.151 | |
| ΔF-statistics (DF) | 43.687 (191)*** | 40.117 (191)*** | 25.736 (189)*** | 7.679 (188)*** |
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | VIFs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | |||||
| Firm industrya | −0.105 (−0.411) | −0.128 (−0.398) | 0.128 (0.540) | 0.129 (0.287) | 1.114 |
| Firm sizeb | 0.126 (0.637) | −0.118 (−0.104) | 0.127 (0.220) | 0.102 (0.128) | 1.336 |
| Firm agec | −0.077 (−1.82) | −0.102 (−1.655) | −0.067 (−1.26) | −0.062 (−1.14) | 1.429 |
| Strategic planning (SP) | 0.476 (6.810) | 0.414 (6.138) | 0.420 (6.333) | 1.096 | |
| Market dynamism (MD) | 0.047 (0.774) | 0.049 (0.810) | 1.124 | ||
| Strategic planning × market dynamism | 0.128 (2.771) | 1.022 | |||
| 0.178 | 0.325 | 0.348 | 0.499 | ||
| Δ | 0.178 | 0.147 | 0.023 | 0.151 | |
| Δ | 43.687 (191)*** | 40.117 (191)*** | 25.736 (189)*** | 7.679 (188)*** |
Notes:
t-values are in the parenthesis;
aDummy variable (industry): 1 = manufacturing; 0 = others; dummy variable (size): 1 = small; 0 = micro;
p < 0.05 (two-tailed);
p < 0.01 (two-tailed); ***model significant at 1%