Socio-demographic attributes, nutrition label outcomes and indicator food intakes of Thai cohort in 2013
| Attributes | na | %b | Attributes | na | %b |
| Sex | Household size (people) | ||||
| Male | 19,295 | 45.1 | 1 | 2,513 | 6.0 |
| Female | 23,455 | 54.9 | 2-4 | 26,306 | 62.4 |
| Age group (years) | 5-15 | 13,350 | 31.7 | ||
| 23-34 | 12,127 | 28.4 | Education | ||
| 35-49 | 23,984 | 56.1 | Non university | 8,603 | 20.2 |
| ⩾50 | 6,639 | 15.5 | University | 33,925 | 79.8 |
| Location | Occupation | ||||
| Rural | 18,913 | 44.7 | Worker | 8,044 | 18.9 |
| Urban | 23,434 | 55.3 | Manager | 6,023 | 14.2 |
| Region | Professional | 11,228 | 26.4 | ||
| Central-East | 13,107 | 30.7 | Office assistant | 13,068 | 30.8 |
| Bangkok | 6,741 | 15.8 | Not working/retired | 2,757 | 6.49 |
| North | 8,580 | 20.1 | Unidentified | 1,370 | 3.22 |
| Northeast | 8,954 | 21.0 | Monthly income (baht) | ||
| South | 5,368 | 12.6 | <10,000 | 9,378 | 22.2 |
| Religionc | 10,001-20,000 | 15,831 | 37.4 | ||
| Buddhist | 40,293 | 94.6 | 20,001-30,000 | 9,234 | 21.8 |
| Muslim | 1,491 | 3.5 | >30,000 | 7,853 | 18.6 |
| Christian | 746 | 1.8 | |||
| Other/none | 72 | 0.2 | |||
| Nutrition label outcomes | na | %b | |||
| Nutrition labels on food? | 37,914 | 89.0 | |||
| Read | 4,708 | 11.1 | |||
| Not read | |||||
| Understand the information on “nutrition labels” | 29,452 | 69.5 | |||
| Good | 12,917 | 30.5 | |||
| Not good | |||||
| Use nutrition labels to assist food purchasing? | |||||
| Frequent use | 27,457 | 64.4 | |||
| Infrequent use | 15,173 | 35.6 | |||
| Like to see additional nutrition labelling on foods? | |||||
| Yes | 40,296 | 96.4 | |||
| No | 418 | 1.0 | |||
| Not sure | 1,076 | 2.6 | |||
| Frequent consumption of indicator foods (⩾3 times/week) | na | %b | |||
| Instant foods | 2,966 | 7.0 | |||
| Soft drinks | 6,169 | 14.6 | |||
| Sweet drinks | 17,277 | 40.7 | |||
| Milk | 19,307 | 45.5 | |||
| Attributes | %b | Attributes | %b | ||
| Male | 19,295 | 45.1 | 1 | 2,513 | 6.0 |
| Female | 23,455 | 54.9 | 2-4 | 26,306 | 62.4 |
| 5-15 | 13,350 | 31.7 | |||
| 23-34 | 12,127 | 28.4 | |||
| 35-49 | 23,984 | 56.1 | Non university | 8,603 | 20.2 |
| ⩾50 | 6,639 | 15.5 | University | 33,925 | 79.8 |
| Rural | 18,913 | 44.7 | Worker | 8,044 | 18.9 |
| Urban | 23,434 | 55.3 | Manager | 6,023 | 14.2 |
| Professional | 11,228 | 26.4 | |||
| Central-East | 13,107 | 30.7 | Office assistant | 13,068 | 30.8 |
| Bangkok | 6,741 | 15.8 | Not working/retired | 2,757 | 6.49 |
| North | 8,580 | 20.1 | Unidentified | 1,370 | 3.22 |
| Northeast | 8,954 | 21.0 | |||
| South | 5,368 | 12.6 | <10,000 | 9,378 | 22.2 |
| 10,001-20,000 | 15,831 | 37.4 | |||
| Buddhist | 40,293 | 94.6 | 20,001-30,000 | 9,234 | 21.8 |
| Muslim | 1,491 | 3.5 | >30,000 | 7,853 | 18.6 |
| Christian | 746 | 1.8 | |||
| Other/none | 72 | 0.2 | |||
| %b | |||||
| Nutrition labels on food? | 37,914 | 89.0 | |||
| Read | 4,708 | 11.1 | |||
| Not read | |||||
| Understand the information on “nutrition labels” | 29,452 | 69.5 | |||
| Good | 12,917 | 30.5 | |||
| Not good | |||||
| Use nutrition labels to assist food purchasing? | |||||
| Frequent use | 27,457 | 64.4 | |||
| Infrequent use | 15,173 | 35.6 | |||
| Like to see additional nutrition labelling on foods? | |||||
| Yes | 40,296 | 96.4 | |||
| No | 418 | 1.0 | |||
| Not sure | 1,076 | 2.6 | |||
| %b | |||||
| Instant foods | 2,966 | 7.0 | |||
| Soft drinks | 6,169 | 14.6 | |||
| Sweet drinks | 17,277 | 40.7 | |||
| Milk | 19,307 | 45.5 | |||
Notes: n=42,750. aSample size may not add to 42,750 due to missing data (0.3-1.1 per cent of variables had missing values); bsome percentages may not equal 100 due to rounding; cinformation on religion obtained from the 2005 TCS baseline survey
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.