Effects of outsourcing participation on TFP
| Variables | OLS (1) | FE (2) | FE, Driscoll Kraay (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dummy_outsourcing | −0.023** | 0.016 | 0.022*** |
| (0.010) | (0.011) | (0.004) | |
| Firm age | −0.001 | 0.001*** | 0.001* |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | |
| Firm size | −0.001 | 0.012*** | −0.008*** |
| (0.001) | (0.004) | (0.003) | |
| Capital structure | 0.041*** | 0.034*** | 0.029*** |
| (0.0110) | (0.013) | (0.010) | |
| Dummy_innovation | 0.021*** | 0.006 | −0.009*** |
| (0.005) | (0.006) | (0.002) | |
| Constant | 1.422*** | 1.233*** | 1.409*** |
| (0.020) | (0.049) | (0.057) | |
| Year dummies | N | N | Y |
| Industry dummies | N | N | Y |
| Observations | 12,939 | 12,939 | 12,939 |
| R-squared | 0.003 | 0.005 | |
| Number of groups | 4,549 | 4,549 | 4,549 |
| Variables | OLS (1) | FE (2) | FE, Driscoll Kraay (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dummy_outsourcing | −0.023** | 0.016 | 0.022*** |
| (0.010) | (0.011) | (0.004) | |
| Firm age | −0.001 | 0.001*** | 0.001* |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | |
| Firm size | −0.001 | 0.012*** | −0.008*** |
| (0.001) | (0.004) | (0.003) | |
| Capital structure | 0.041*** | 0.034*** | 0.029*** |
| (0.0110) | (0.013) | (0.010) | |
| Dummy_innovation | 0.021*** | 0.006 | −0.009*** |
| (0.005) | (0.006) | (0.002) | |
| Constant | 1.422*** | 1.233*** | 1.409*** |
| (0.020) | (0.049) | (0.057) | |
| Year dummies | N | N | Y |
| Industry dummies | N | N | Y |
| Observations | 12,939 | 12,939 | 12,939 |
| R-squared | 0.003 | 0.005 | |
| Number of groups | 4,549 | 4,549 | 4,549 |
Note(s): (1) Robust t-statistics in parentheses; (2)*p < 0.1; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01
For definitions of the variables, please refer to Table 1
Source(s): Authors’ calculations from STATA software
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.