Charted data
| Author | Definition of motivation to transfer learning | Aim/Purpose of the study | Design | Models/Theory used | Instruments used to measure motivation to transfer learning | Factors influencing motivation to transfer | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belenky and Nokes-Malach (2012) | None described | Explore the role of motivation in knowledge transfer, specifically focussing on how students' achievement goals impact transfer | Quantitative 2 × 2 pre- and post-test study design | Model of achievement goal | Achievement goal questionnaire | Invention activities facilitate mastery-approach goal adoption |
|
| Belenky and Nokes-Malach (2013) | None described | To examine the effect of individual differences in student motivation operationalised as achievement goal on knowledge transfer | Quantitative 2 × 2 pre- and post-test study design | Achievement Goal theory | Achievement Goal questionnaire | Classroom grading structure |
|
| Gonzalez (2012) | None described | To identify and validate a model that describes the role motivational constructs play in promoting transfer of learning | Quantitative, correlational, descriptive and explanatory approach design | Bandura self-efficacy theory | Motivation instrument Prior knowledge instrument Self-regulated learning instrument Transfer of learning tasks | The types of learning activities used, and the among of authority given to students. Individual difference |
|
| James (2012) | Transfer motivation is a combination of effort, desire and attitude that influence whether an individual will apply L2 learning from one context in a different context | To investigate motivation to transfer second language learning (L2) or L2 transfer motivation | A qualitative research descriptive study design | None described | None | Self-efficacy, goal-orientation, and interest prior knowledge, Self-regulation learning |
|
| Joo et al. (2014) | As the trainee's desire to apply the knowledge and skills that they have learned from the training programme | To investigate the effect of internal values as a personal characteristic of learners | Quantitative, descriptive study design | Integrative model | Author developed | Perception of resource availability; Perceptions of opportunity for transfer; Personal beliefs about transfer; Expected impact of transfer; Perceptions of competence; Attitudes toward learning outcome; Attitudes toward learning and transfer context/task |
|
| Khorshidi and Nimchahi (2013) | None described | to investigate the impact of integrative and instrumental motivation on the development of interlanguage pragmatics in Iranian English language learners | Quantitative, descriptive study design | None described | Attitude/Motivation test battery (AMTB) Additional author developed | Learner characteristics, training design and external environment |
|
| Peters et al. (2012) | Motivation to transfer predicts the effort with which the trainee will try to apply to his job what he learned during training | To determine the mediating role of satisfaction between motivation to train | Quantitative, pre- and post-test design | Flawed four-level evaluation model | Author generated | Learner motivation |
|
| Yurtseven and Altun (2016) | None described | To investigate students' foreign language learning motivation and views about integration of Understanding by design (UbD) into their lessons | Mixed Method design | None described | Attitude/Motivation test battery (AMTB) | Motivation to take advantage of these opportunities |
|
| Author | Definition of motivation to transfer learning | Aim/Purpose of the study | Design | Models/Theory used | Instruments used to measure motivation to transfer learning | Factors influencing motivation to transfer | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| None described | Explore the role of motivation in knowledge transfer, specifically focussing on how students' achievement goals impact transfer | Quantitative 2 × 2 pre- and post-test study design | Model of achievement goal | Achievement goal questionnaire | Invention activities facilitate mastery-approach goal adoption | More endorsement of a mastery-approach orientation predicted better transfer Invention activities would lead to more focus on the conceptual features of the learning activities Very high in mastery-approach orientation were likely to transfer regardless of the type of instruction | |
| None described | To examine the effect of individual differences in student motivation operationalised as achievement goal on knowledge transfer | Quantitative 2 × 2 pre- and post-test study design | Achievement Goal theory | Achievement Goal questionnaire | Classroom grading structure | Effect of existing mastery-approach orientation on transfer Students high in mastery-approach goal orientation at the beginning of the experiment were more likely to transfer from instruction to a target problem Certain combinations of tasks framings and structures may influence the relationship between mastery-approach goals orientation and transfer Not observe an effect on invention promoting transfer relative to tell- and-practice Invention activities led to more task-based mastery goal adoption than tell- and practice activities The way in which a task is framed seems to matter more for some types of activities than others A complex interaction between students' existing mastery approach achievement goal orientation, structure, framing, and transfer was observed in the current study No observed effect framing of goal adoption, even though one framing was designed to promote task-based adoption | |
| None described | To identify and validate a model that describes the role motivational constructs play in promoting transfer of learning | Quantitative, correlational, descriptive and explanatory approach design | Bandura self-efficacy theory | Motivation instrument | The types of learning activities used, and the among of authority given to students. Individual difference | A direct and indirect relationship between prior knowledge and transfer A slightly stronger relationship as found between motivation and self-regulated learning Both goal-orientation and interest load weakly on the motivation factor As a learner’ levels of motivation increase we can expect increased self-regulated behaviours such as more error checking, questioning materials, and focussing on critical parts of the problem being solved even for learners with average levels of prior knowledge Motivation's effect on transfer and self-regulated learning appears to be moderate | |
| Transfer motivation is a combination of effort, desire and attitude that influence whether an individual will apply L2 learning from one context in a different context | To investigate motivation to transfer second language learning (L2) or L2 transfer motivation | A qualitative research descriptive study design | None described | None | Self-efficacy, goal-orientation, and interest prior knowledge, Self-regulation learning | High attitudes toward transfer of learning from one to other courses were favourable Increased desire to transfer learning from one module to the other Less numbers made decisions for conscious effort to transfer learning from one course to another | |
| As the trainee's desire to apply the knowledge and skills that they have learned from the training programme | To investigate the effect of internal values as a personal characteristic of learners | Quantitative, descriptive study design | Integrative model | Author developed | Perception of resource availability; Perceptions of opportunity for transfer; Personal beliefs about transfer; Expected impact of transfer; Perceptions of competence; Attitudes toward learning outcome; Attitudes toward learning and transfer context/task | The effects of e-learners internal value, learning usefulness, satisfaction with learning environment, achievement internal value, learning usefulness, and satisfaction on transfer motivation were significant No effect of learning environment on transfer motivation | |
| None described | to investigate the impact of integrative and instrumental motivation on the development of interlanguage pragmatics in Iranian English language learners | Quantitative, descriptive study design | None described | Attitude/Motivation test battery (AMTB) | Learner characteristics, training design and external environment | Learners with integrative motivation performed better on the test of pragmatics than instrumentally motivated ones Learners with integrative motivation performed better than the learners with instrumental motivation this research study supports the belief that integrative motivation is an asset to learners for successful language learning | |
| Motivation to transfer predicts the effort with which the trainee will try to apply to his job what he learned during training | To determine the mediating role of satisfaction between motivation to train | Quantitative, pre- and post-test design | Flawed four-level evaluation model | Author generated | Learner motivation | Extrinsic motivation does not predict utility-satisfaction or motivation to transfer Only intrinsic motivation has a single influence on enjoyment-satisfaction Lack of personal interaction increase perceived training difficulties and less enjoyment Enjoyment-satisfaction does not influence motivation to transfer No significant relationship between learning and motivation to transfer learning Enjoyment satisfaction predicts the learning outcome Motivation to transfer is predicted by a utility type reaction and negatively by the perception of difficulty | |
| None described | To investigate students' foreign language learning motivation and views about integration of Understanding by design (UbD) into their lessons | Mixed Method design | None described | Attitude/Motivation test battery (AMTB) | Motivation to take advantage of these opportunities | The integration of UbD in EFL teaching requires deep internalisation of the authentic and original use of the language rather than word for word translation or text analysis Two themes are motivation and knowledge transfer It was concluded that UbD could be an effective tool to raise student academic achievement |
As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.
Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.
Please sign in to your personal account to gift article access.
As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.
Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.
Gift articles remaining: --
Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.
Gift articles remaining: --
As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.
Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses.
You have reached the limit of 10 links within a 30 day period.
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.