Table 1. Comparison of R 2 between PLS... | Emerald Publishing

Table 1.

Comparison of R² between PLS mode A, PLS mode B and canonical correlation weights using the ECSI data set

	PLS Mode A	PLS Mode B	Canonical correlation weights
Composite weights
imag1	0.263	0.138	0.521
imag2	0.226	0.204	–0.118
imag3	0.229	0.123	–0.266
imag4	0.342	0.383	–0.251
imag5	0.366	0.520	–0.850
cusa1	0.371	0.347	–0.351
cusa2	0.366	0.146	–0.107
cusa3	0.462	0.676	–0.703
cusco	1	1	1
cusl1	0.452	0.208	–0.244
cusl2	0.133	0.105	–0.092
cusl3	0.658	0.856	–0.833
Regression of loyalty
Image	0.206	0.183	0.201
Satisfaction	0.481	0.524	0.560
Complaints	0.066	0.074	–0.086
R²	0.462	0.499	0.514

	PLS Mode A	PLS Mode B	Canonical correlation weights
Composite weights
imag1	0.263	0.138	0.521
imag2	0.226	0.204	–0.118
imag3	0.229	0.123	–0.266
imag4	0.342	0.383	–0.251
imag5	0.366	0.520	–0.850
cusa1	0.371	0.347	–0.351
cusa2	0.366	0.146	–0.107
cusa3	0.462	0.676	–0.703
cusco	1	1	1
cusl1	0.452	0.208	–0.244
cusl2	0.133	0.105	–0.092
cusl3	0.658	0.856	–0.833
Regression of loyalty
Image	0.206	0.183	0.201
Satisfaction	0.481	0.524	0.560
Complaints	0.066	0.074	–0.086
R²	0.462	0.499	0.514