Table 4 Methods used in stakeholder... | Emerald Publishing

Table 4

Methods used in stakeholder identification in the study area

S/N	Methods	Overall		Trad	D&B	MC	F-stat	p-value
S/N	Methods	MS	Rank	MS	MS	MS	F-stat	p-value
1	Brainstorming in group meetings	4.33	1	4.35	4.38	4.20	0.45	0.65
2	Interview with experts	3.20	2	3.35	2.88	3.20	2.60	0.09
3	Identification by other stakeholders	3.00	3	3.12	3.25	2.20	1.19	0.32
4	Checklist	2.97	4	3.18	2.63	2.80	0.74	0.49
5	Focus group	2.83	5	3.24	1.75	3.20	1.96	0.16
6	Through oral or written account of major events	2.60	6	2.82	2.75	1.60	0.49	0.62
7	Written records or census data	2.37	7	2.35	2.75	1.80	4.22	0.03*
8	Intuition	2.20	8	1.82	3.38	1.60	2.95	0.07
9	Self-selection in response to an advertisement or announcement	1.93	9	1.65	2.63	1.80	6.89	0.00*
10	Snowballing method	0.93	10	0.94	1.13	0.60	0.42	0.67
11	Use of a questionnaire	0.87	11	0.71	1.63	0.20	0.40	0.67
12	Delphi method	0.80	12	1.06	0.63	0.20	0.98	0.39
13	Public hearing	0.57	13	0.59	0.50	0.60	0.55	0.582

S/N	Methods	Overall		Trad	D&B	MC	F-stat	p-value
S/N	Methods	MS	Rank	MS	MS	MS	F-stat	p-value
1	Brainstorming in group meetings	4.33	1	4.35	4.38	4.20	0.45	0.65
2	Interview with experts	3.20	2	3.35	2.88	3.20	2.60	0.09
3	Identification by other stakeholders	3.00	3	3.12	3.25	2.20	1.19	0.32
4	Checklist	2.97	4	3.18	2.63	2.80	0.74	0.49
5	Focus group	2.83	5	3.24	1.75	3.20	1.96	0.16
6	Through oral or written account of major events	2.60	6	2.82	2.75	1.60	0.49	0.62
7	Written records or census data	2.37	7	2.35	2.75	1.80	4.22	0.03*
8	Intuition	2.20	8	1.82	3.38	1.60	2.95	0.07
9	Self-selection in response to an advertisement or announcement	1.93	9	1.65	2.63	1.80	6.89	0.00*
10	Snowballing method	0.93	10	0.94	1.13	0.60	0.42	0.67
11	Use of a questionnaire	0.87	11	0.71	1.63	0.20	0.40	0.67
12	Delphi method	0.80	12	1.06	0.63	0.20	0.98	0.39
13	Public hearing	0.57	13	0.59	0.50	0.60	0.55	0.582

Note(s): Key: *p value significant at 0.05, Trad = traditional, D&B = design and build, MC = management contracting