Econometric analysis
| Model 1 TC | Model 2 SC | Model 3 UC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 5.664*** | 3.868*** | 1.789*** |
| (0.067) | (0.112) | (0.110) | |
| Municipal waste generated | −0.430*** | −0.618*** | −0.448*** |
| (0.016) | (0.026) | (0.025) | |
| Municipality km2 | 0.477*** | 0.663*** | 0.426*** |
| (0.017) | (0.027) | (0.027) | |
| Percentage of sorted waste | −0.114*** | −0.414*** | 0.439*** |
| (0.013) | (0.022) | (0.021) | |
| Population density | 0.407*** | 0.606*** | 0.367*** |
| (0.016) | (0.027) | (0.027) | |
| Altitude | 0.024*** | 0.025*** | −0.005 |
| (0.004) | (0.006) | (0.006) | |
| Coastal municipality | 0.314*** | 0.245*** | 0.271*** |
| (0.013) | (0.021) | (0.021) | |
| N | 4,152 | 3,430 | 4,031 |
| R2 | 0.322 | 0.295 | 0.198 |
| Model 1 TC | Model 2 SC | Model 3 UC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 5.664*** | 3.868*** | 1.789*** |
| (0.067) | (0.112) | (0.110) | |
| Municipal waste generated | −0.430*** | −0.618*** | −0.448*** |
| (0.016) | (0.026) | (0.025) | |
| Municipality km2 | 0.477*** | 0.663*** | 0.426*** |
| (0.017) | (0.027) | (0.027) | |
| Percentage of sorted waste | −0.114*** | −0.414*** | 0.439*** |
| (0.013) | (0.022) | (0.021) | |
| Population density | 0.407*** | 0.606*** | 0.367*** |
| (0.016) | (0.027) | (0.027) | |
| Altitude | 0.024*** | 0.025*** | −0.005 |
| (0.004) | (0.006) | (0.006) | |
| Coastal municipality | 0.314*** | 0.245*** | 0.271*** |
| (0.013) | (0.021) | (0.021) | |
| N | 4,152 | 3,430 | 4,031 |
| R2 | 0.322 | 0.295 | 0.198 |
Note(s): ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. Logarithms (except coastal municipality being a dummy)
Source(s): Author's creation
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.