Opportunities of alternative scenarios
| One firm. Figure 1 (a) | More firms. Figure 1 (b, c, d) |
|---|---|
|
|
| One firm. | More firms. |
|---|---|
Economies of scope Coordination among the grantor and the concessionaire Reduction of transaction costs resulting from fewer contracts Equity and same quality of the service provided to citizens Technological innovation given that positive linkages between size and innovation can occur in presence of high sunk costs Quality standardisation that derives from the same organisation of inputs Economies of scale especially in the collection phase | Competitive environment Lower bargaining power of the concessionaire More symmetric information and performance comparison among competitors Low market concentration that if not properly regulated may lead to inefficiency in the medium-term due to the loss of market attractivity for potential efficient firms Reduced risks of market foreclosure level playing field |
Source(s): Author's creation
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.