Measurement model results
| Constructs | Code | Item wording | S.L | S.E | t-value1,2 | Α | C.R | AVE3 | VIF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable supplier selection (SSS) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = No extent whatsoever to 7 = Very great extent | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.77 | 3.24 | ||||
| SR1 | We seek suppliers based on their reasonability toward the environment | 0.87 | 0.02 | 34.91 | |||||
| SR2 | We seek suppliers based on their reasonability toward diversity | 0.91 | 0.01 | 64.24 | |||||
| SR3 | We seek suppliers based on their reasonability toward human rights | 0.91 | 0.02 | 56.84 | |||||
| SR4 | We seek suppliers based on their reasonability toward philanthropy | 0.89 | 0.02 | 38.76 | |||||
| SR5 | We seek suppliers based on their with reasonability toward safety | 0.89 | 0.02 | 45.77 | |||||
| SR6 | We seek suppliers based on their commitment to sustainability by addressing/balancing environmental, social and economic perspectives in their business decisions | 0.76 | 0.04 | 21.56 | |||||
| Resource investment in social programs (RINV) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = Extremely unimportant to 7 = Extremely important | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.77 | 3.20 | ||||
| RINV1 | Investment in SRSS-related technology/innovations | 0.87 | 0.05 | 19.14 | |||||
| RINV2 | Resource endowment to benefit underprivileged social groups | 0.98 | 0.02 | 39.25 | |||||
| RINV3 | Providing jobs for the disabled | 0.87 | 0.05 | 17.59 | |||||
| RINV4 | Investing in local economic development | 0.73 | 0.07 | 10.6 | |||||
| RINV5 | Supporting education/culture/arts programs | 0.74 | 0.07 | 10.9 | |||||
| RINV6 | Investing in national economic development | 0.72 | 0.09 | 7.94 | |||||
| Supplier's diversity focus (SDF) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.10 | ||||
| SDF1 | We try to choose suppliers that are owned by minority ethnic groups/women | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| Supplier's environmental focus (SEF) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.66 | 2.30 | ||||
| SEF1 | We try to choose suppliers whose processes/products are environmentally safe | 0.91 | 0.01 | 65.9 | |||||
| SEF2 | We try to choose suppliers that use recyclable/reusable packaging | 0.94 | 0.01 | 87.92 | |||||
| SEF3 | We try to choose suppliers who participate in green purchasing initiative | 0.56 | 0.07 | 8.18 | |||||
| SEF4 | We try to choose suppliers that create as little waste as possible | 0.79 | 0.04 | 19.18 | |||||
| Supplier's ethical treatment (SET) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.72 | 2.41 | ||||
| SET1 | We avoid tactics that could mislead supplier salespeople during negotiations | 0.82 | 0.03 | 23.65 | |||||
| SET2 | We never lie or exaggerate when negotiating with suppliers | 0.89 | 0.02 | 58.39 | |||||
| SET3 | We avoid blaming suppliers for mistakes that were our own fault | 0.86 | 0.02 | 43.38 | |||||
| SET4 | We avoid using terms in our supply contracts that would allow us to take unfair advantage of suppliers | 0.82 | 0.03 | 29.53 | |||||
| Supplier's human rights focus (SHR) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.81 | 3.50 | ||||
| SHR1 | We try to choose suppliers that do not use sweatshop labor | 0.89 | 0.02 | 42.52 | |||||
| SHR2 | We try to choose suppliers that do not use child labor | 0.90 | 0.02 | 51.25 | |||||
| SHR3 | We try to choose suppliers that pay their employees a fair wage to live on | 0.93 | 0.01 | 84.46 | |||||
| SHR4 | We try to choose suppliers that support human rights | 0.87 | 0.02 | 40.63 | |||||
| Supplier's community focus (FCF) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.82 | 3.03 | ||||
| FCF1 | We try help our local economy by choosing local suppliers whenever possible | 0.84 | 0.04 | 19.79 | |||||
| FCF2 | We value social programs sponsored by our suppliers | 0.93 | 0.01 | 80.67 | |||||
| FCF3 | We value awareness of social issues by our suppliers | 0.94 | 0.01 | 112.87 | |||||
| FCF4 | Providing an opportunity for other local businesses to succeed is important to the success of our company | 0.91 | 0.01 | 73.70 | |||||
| Supplier's safety focus (SSF) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 2.65 | ||||
| SSF1 | We try to choose suppliers that operate a safe work environment | 0.93 | 0.02 | 56.42 | |||||
| SSF2 | We try to choose suppliers that move and deliver good safety | 0.93 | 0.01 | 65.06 | |||||
| Financial performance (FP) | Compared to other companies that do the same kind of work as yours, how does your company compare over the last 3 years on (please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = much worse to 7 = much better) | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 1.50 | ||||
| FP1 | Sales revenues | 0.90 | 0.02 | 55.24 | |||||
| FP2 | Sales growth | 0.90 | 0.02 | 37.56 | |||||
| FP3 | Market share | 0.90 | 0.01 | 64.75 | |||||
| Firm's age | Age | How long has your organization been established? (1. 10 or less; 2. 11–50; 3. 50 or more) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.15 |
| Firm's size | Size | What is your company size (employees)? (1. 100 or less; 2. 101–1,000; 3. 1,001–10,000; 4. 10,001+) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.10 |
| Annual revenue | Revenue | How large is your organization (annual revenues)? (1. $0 to $250M; 2. $250 to $500M; 3. $500M to $1B; 4. $1B to $3B; 5. $3B+) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.01 |
| Industry type | Industry | Which category best describes your organization's primary industry? (1. Supplier; 2. Manufacturer; 3. Distributor; 4. Retailer; 5. Transportation; 6. Mineral Resource; 7. Other) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.07 |
| Ownership | Ownership | Please indicate the ownership structure of your organization. (1. Private; 2. Public; 3. Joint -Public/Private) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.09 |
| Constructs | Code | Item wording | S.L | S.E | C.R | AVE3 | VIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable supplier selection (SSS) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = No extent whatsoever to 7 = Very great extent | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.77 | 3.24 | ||||
| SR1 | We seek suppliers based on their reasonability toward the environment | 0.87 | 0.02 | 34.91 | |||||
| SR2 | We seek suppliers based on their reasonability toward diversity | 0.91 | 0.01 | 64.24 | |||||
| SR3 | We seek suppliers based on their reasonability toward human rights | 0.91 | 0.02 | 56.84 | |||||
| SR4 | We seek suppliers based on their reasonability toward philanthropy | 0.89 | 0.02 | 38.76 | |||||
| SR5 | We seek suppliers based on their with reasonability toward safety | 0.89 | 0.02 | 45.77 | |||||
| SR6 | We seek suppliers based on their commitment to sustainability by addressing/balancing environmental, social and economic perspectives in their business decisions | 0.76 | 0.04 | 21.56 | |||||
| Resource investment in social programs (RINV) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = Extremely unimportant to 7 = Extremely important | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.77 | 3.20 | ||||
| RINV1 | Investment in SRSS-related technology/innovations | 0.87 | 0.05 | 19.14 | |||||
| RINV2 | Resource endowment to benefit underprivileged social groups | 0.98 | 0.02 | 39.25 | |||||
| RINV3 | Providing jobs for the disabled | 0.87 | 0.05 | 17.59 | |||||
| RINV4 | Investing in local economic development | 0.73 | 0.07 | 10.6 | |||||
| RINV5 | Supporting education/culture/arts programs | 0.74 | 0.07 | 10.9 | |||||
| RINV6 | Investing in national economic development | 0.72 | 0.09 | 7.94 | |||||
| Supplier's diversity focus (SDF) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.10 | ||||
| SDF1 | We try to choose suppliers that are owned by minority ethnic groups/women | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| Supplier's environmental focus (SEF) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.66 | 2.30 | ||||
| SEF1 | We try to choose suppliers whose processes/products are environmentally safe | 0.91 | 0.01 | 65.9 | |||||
| SEF2 | We try to choose suppliers that use recyclable/reusable packaging | 0.94 | 0.01 | 87.92 | |||||
| SEF3 | We try to choose suppliers who participate in green purchasing initiative | 0.56 | 0.07 | 8.18 | |||||
| SEF4 | We try to choose suppliers that create as little waste as possible | 0.79 | 0.04 | 19.18 | |||||
| Supplier's ethical treatment (SET) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.72 | 2.41 | ||||
| SET1 | We avoid tactics that could mislead supplier salespeople during negotiations | 0.82 | 0.03 | 23.65 | |||||
| SET2 | We never lie or exaggerate when negotiating with suppliers | 0.89 | 0.02 | 58.39 | |||||
| SET3 | We avoid blaming suppliers for mistakes that were our own fault | 0.86 | 0.02 | 43.38 | |||||
| SET4 | We avoid using terms in our supply contracts that would allow us to take unfair advantage of suppliers | 0.82 | 0.03 | 29.53 | |||||
| Supplier's human rights focus (SHR) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.81 | 3.50 | ||||
| SHR1 | We try to choose suppliers that do not use sweatshop labor | 0.89 | 0.02 | 42.52 | |||||
| SHR2 | We try to choose suppliers that do not use child labor | 0.90 | 0.02 | 51.25 | |||||
| SHR3 | We try to choose suppliers that pay their employees a fair wage to live on | 0.93 | 0.01 | 84.46 | |||||
| SHR4 | We try to choose suppliers that support human rights | 0.87 | 0.02 | 40.63 | |||||
| Supplier's community focus (FCF) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.82 | 3.03 | ||||
| FCF1 | We try help our local economy by choosing local suppliers whenever possible | 0.84 | 0.04 | 19.79 | |||||
| FCF2 | We value social programs sponsored by our suppliers | 0.93 | 0.01 | 80.67 | |||||
| FCF3 | We value awareness of social issues by our suppliers | 0.94 | 0.01 | 112.87 | |||||
| FCF4 | Providing an opportunity for other local businesses to succeed is important to the success of our company | 0.91 | 0.01 | 73.70 | |||||
| Supplier's safety focus (SSF) | Please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 2.65 | ||||
| SSF1 | We try to choose suppliers that operate a safe work environment | 0.93 | 0.02 | 56.42 | |||||
| SSF2 | We try to choose suppliers that move and deliver good safety | 0.93 | 0.01 | 65.06 | |||||
| Financial performance (FP) | Compared to other companies that do the same kind of work as yours, how does your company compare over the last 3 years on (please indicate your choice on a scale 1 = much worse to 7 = much better) | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 1.50 | ||||
| FP1 | Sales revenues | 0.90 | 0.02 | 55.24 | |||||
| FP2 | Sales growth | 0.90 | 0.02 | 37.56 | |||||
| FP3 | Market share | 0.90 | 0.01 | 64.75 | |||||
| Firm's age | Age | How long has your organization been established? (1. 10 or less; 2. 11–50; 3. 50 or more) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.15 |
| Firm's size | Size | What is your company size (employees)? (1. 100 or less; 2. 101–1,000; 3. 1,001–10,000; 4. 10,001+) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.10 |
| Annual revenue | Revenue | How large is your organization (annual revenues)? (1. $0 to $250M; 2. $250 to $500M; 3. $500M to $1B; 4. $1B to $3B; 5. $3B+) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.01 |
| Industry type | Industry | Which category best describes your organization's primary industry? (1. Supplier; 2. Manufacturer; 3. Distributor; 4. Retailer; 5. Transportation; 6. Mineral Resource; 7. Other) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.07 |
| Ownership | Ownership | Please indicate the ownership structure of your organization. (1. Private; 2. Public; 3. Joint -Public/Private) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.09 |
Note(s): ‘B’ stands for Baht, the name of Thai currency. I baht = 32 $US
S.L = Standard loadings; S.E = Standard error; 1Test-statistics are obtained by 5,000 Bootstrap runs; 2 Absolute t-values > 1.96 are two-tailed significant at 5%; α = Cronbach's alpha; C.R = Composite reliability; AVE = Average variance extracted; 3Percentage of variance of item explained by the latent variable; VIF = Variance inflation factor
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.