Table 7

Real earnings management, poison pill and IPO failure

Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4
AbnCFO0.098   
(1.534)   
AbnProd 0.758**  
 (2.435)  
AbnDISX  0.109*** 
  (4.818) 
Rm_PROXY   0.129***
   (4.032)
Abs_DA0.066−0.686−0.831−1.067
(0.088)(−0.890)(−1.149)(−1.337)
Poison Pill0.526***0.516***0.507***0.534***
(5.019)(4.874)(4.816)(5.070)
Offerprice−0.003−0.003−0.003−0.003
(−1.579)(−1.364)(−1.204)(−1.320)
Firstday_ret0.0030.0030.0030.003
(0.937)(0.854)(0.878)(0.879)
BTM0.347**0.289*0.349**0.299**
(2.369)(1.916)(2.326)(1.998)
Leverage−0.2200.325**−0.277−0.257*
(−1.554)(2.256)(−1.906)(−1.786)
Logage−0.0010.0050.0180.027
(−0.018)(0.075)(0.262)(0.392)
ROA−0.753−3.063***−2.674***−2.870***
(−1.368)(−5.099)(−4.543)(−4.839)
Overhang−0.000−0.000−0.000−0.000
(−0.814)(−0.775)(−0.729)(−0.727)
VC_Dummy0.1540.1000.0660.108
(1.350)(0.862)(0.570)(0.933)
Big4−0.036−0.015−0.033−0.048
(−0.342)(−0.139)(−0.311)(−0.452)
Gross_margin−0.189−0.349**−0.369**−0.205
(−1.189)(−1.992)(−2.097)(−1.301)
Nidummy0.089−0.157−0.182−0.150
(0.592)(−0.974)(−1.132)(−0.939)
Constant1.8872.2632.5972.076
(1.241)(1.425)(1.637)(1.313)
Firm and year fixed effectsYesYesYesYes
Wald χ2332.49357.42365.60354.89
Log pseudolikelihood−1467.31−1458.30−1449.76−1453.26
Observations2,9972,9972,9972,997
Pseudo R20.1290.1340.1390.137

Note(s): This table reports results from regressing IPO real earnings management on IPO failure while controlling for poison pill from 1993 to 2015. Our dependent variable is a dummy variable equal to 1 if the firm failed within five years. Models 1 to 3 report the logistic regression results of from regressing AbnCFO, AbnPROD and AbnDISX on IPO failure controlling for poison pill. Model 4 presents the results from regressing the aggregate measure of real earnings management.  Appendix outlines definitions and data sources for the regression variables. Robust t-statistics adjusted for clustering by firm are reported inside the parentheses

* Statistical significance at the 10% level

** Statistical significance at the 5% level

*** Statistical significance at the 1% level

Source(s): Table by authors

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal