Table 5

Results of indirect effect model

HypothesisIndirect effectBetaSEt-value95% CIp-valueVAFFindings
H9Ethical climate → ID−0.0900.0263.420[0.011; 0.031]0.00026%Partial mediation
H10Ethical climate → OD0.0100.0160.601[–0.109; 0.034]0.274−20%No mediation
H11Institutional policy → ID−0.0380.0172.157[0.058; 0.002]0.01644%Partial mediation
H12Institutional policy → OD0.0040.0070.561[–0.004; 0.015]0.288−1%No mediation
H13Workload → ID0.0910.0273.335[0.036; 0.119]0.00041%Partial mediation
H14Workload → OD−0.0100.0170.588[–0.036; 0.009]0.278−14%No mediation
H15Work pressure → ID0.0980.0323.070[0.042; 0.139]0.00122%Partial mediation
H16Work pressure → OD−0.0100.0170.611[–0.040; 0.013]0.271−31%No mediation
  IDODNeutra    
 R2 – Interpersonal deviance0.3680.0300.492    
 Q2 – Organisational deviance0.2800.0110.394    
 SRMR0.06    

Note(s): **Significant at 0.01 (1-tailed), *Significant at 0.05 (1-tailed). ID = interpersonal deviance, OD = organisational deviance, WL workload, WP = work pressure, IP = institutional policy and EC = ethical climate

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options