Impact of land transfer on total household productivity1
| Explained variable | Model I | Model II | Model III |
|---|---|---|---|
| renin | 0.143*** (0.050) | 0.151*** (0.050) | 0.158*** (0.052) |
| lnT | 0.052 (0.039) | −0.021 (0.052) | – |
| – | |||
| lnK | 0.111*** (0.016) | 0.09*** (0.018) | – |
| – | |||
| propensity score | – | – | −1.068* (0.564) |
| – | – | ||
| dm_lnT | – | 0.216*** (0.074) | – |
| – | – | ||
| dm_lnK | – | 0.065* (0.038) | – |
| – | – | ||
| dm_propen_score | – | – | 2.857*** (1.064) |
| Constant | 8.657*** (0.798) | 8.921*** (0.855) | 10.159*** (1.005) |
| R2 | 0.246 | 0.259 | 0.220 |
| N | 1860 | 1860 | 1860 |
| Explained variable | Model I | Model II | Model III |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.143*** (0.050) | 0.151*** (0.050) | 0.158*** (0.052) | |
| ln | 0.052 (0.039) | −0.021 (0.052) | – |
| – | |||
| ln | 0.111*** (0.016) | 0.09*** (0.018) | – |
| – | |||
| – | – | −1.068* (0.564) | |
| – | – | ||
| dm_ln | – | 0.216*** (0.074) | – |
| – | – | ||
| dm_ln | – | 0.065* (0.038) | – |
| – | – | ||
| dm_ | – | – | 2.857*** (1.064) |
| Constant | 8.657*** (0.798) | 8.921*** (0.855) | 10.159*** (1.005) |
| 0.246 | 0.259 | 0.220 | |
| N | 1860 | 1860 | 1860 |
Note(s): 1Due to spatial constraints, the table omits the estimation results of the regional dummy variable. Values in parentheses represent standard deviations, while *, ** and *** denote significance at 10%, 5% and 1% levels, respectively. In the table, “dm_” signifies interaction terms between the net value of each explained variable minus its mean and renin (or renout in Tables 5 and 6). The relevant descriptions below are consistent with this footnote.
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.