Table 2.

Descriptive statistics

GenderMarital statusGender × Marital Status
Construct/questionsFull sampleMalesFemalesUnmarriedMarriedUnmarried
males
Married
males
Unmarried
females
Married
females
Motivation to mitigate climate change4.22(0.89)4.12(0.97)4.32(0.78)**4.21(0.84)4.23(0.91)4.11(0.93)#4.13(1)#4.32(0.69)#4.32(0.82)#
Male breadwinner@2.44(1.72)2.63(1.79)2.25(1.63)**2.14(1.54)2.61(1.79)**2.22(1.61)$2.91(1.85)#2.03(1.44)$2.35(1.7)$
Working mothers/children relationships5.64(1.39)5.47(1.46)5.79(1.3)**5.7(1.35)5.6(1.41)5.59(1.4)#$5.39(1.5)$5.83(1.28)#5.78(1.31)#$
Independent women5.71(1.46)5.51(1.51)5.90(1.38)**5.74(1.4)5.69(1.49)5.56(1.44)#$5.47(1.56)$5.97(1.34)#5.87(1.41)#$
Gendered jobs@2.19(1.39)2.29(1.49)2.08(1.28)2.04(1.33)2.26(1.42)2.06(1.37)$2.45(1.55)#2.02(1.3)$2.11(1.28)$
Men participate in household works@6.29(1.06)6.18(1.1)6.39(1.02)*6.39(0.87)6.24(1.15)6.31(0.85)#$6.1(1.23)$6.48(0.89)#6.35(1.07)#
Wives help husbands’ careers@3.28(1.87)3.31(1.84)3.26(1.89)2.67(1.64)3.62(1.9)**2.80(1.59)$3.65(1.92)#2.51(1.69)$3.59(1.89)#
Climate change perception15.3(3.3)14.7(3.46)15.86(3.06)**15.27(3.29)15.31(3.33)14.67(3.41)$14.73(3.5)$16.01(2.97)#15.8(3.1)#
Feminine mitigation behaviors@2.7(1.35)2.31(1.16)3.07(1.41)**2.49(1.25)2.82(1.39)**2.18(1)$2.4(1.25)$2.87(1.41)#3.17(1.4)#
Males being mocked1.41(0.73)1.4(0.68)1.43(0.78)1.37(0.71)1.44(0.75)1.32(0.6)1.45(0.73)1.44(0.82)1.42(0.76)

Notes:

Numbers are reported with means (standard deviations). Mean differences in gender and marital status were evaluated using t tests.

*

and

**

indicate statistically significant differences at p < < 0.05 and p < < 0.01, respectively. One-way analysis of variance or Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed to evaluate mean differences in the groups categorized by gender and marital status.

#

and

$

indicate numbers belonging to the same subgroups in post-hoc comparisons using the Gabriel method.

@

represents mean score differences tested using Kruskal–Wallis tests

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal