Descriptive analysis of CBs vs IBs – credit risk management (after crisis)
| Conventional | Islamic | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | M | SD | M | SD | Mean difference | p-value |
| E17 | 0.3766 | 0.85921 | 0.2120 | 0.47382 | (0.165) | 0.331 |
| Average | 0.377 | 0.212 | −0.165 | *** | ||
| Grand Average | 0.202 | 0.214 | 0.012 | **** | ||
| Conventional | Islamic | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | M | M | Mean difference | |||
| E17 | 0.3766 | 0.85921 | 0.2120 | 0.47382 | (0.165) | 0.331 |
| − | ||||||
Notes:
CBs perform slightly better in terms of credit risk;
On average, IBs in Pakistan perform better than CBs after financial crisis
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.