Descriptive analysis of CBs vs IBs – LQ (before crisis)
| Conventional | Islamic | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | M | SD | M | SD | Mean difference | p-value |
| E1 | 0.1723 | 0.07593 | 0.4500 | 0.23290 | 0.278 | 0.000 |
| E2 | 0.2062 | 0.12316 | 0.4636 | 0.16473 | 0.257 | 0.000 |
| E3 | 0.0687 | 0.03171 | 0.0177 | 0.01317 | (0.051) | 0.000 |
| E4 | 0.0653 | 0.05561 | 0.0123 | 0.00671 | (0.053) | 0.001 |
| E5 | 0.6690 | 0.28030 | 0.8641 | 0.29594 | 0.195 | 0.058 |
| E6 | 0.2536 | 0.25440 | 0.0202 | 0.06585 | (0.233) | 0.001 |
| E7 | 0.0309 | 0.03263 | 0.0109 | 0.00852 | (0.020) | 0.021 |
| E8 | 0.0369 | 0.07723 | 0.0174 | 0.18051 | (0.020) | 0.692 |
| Average | 0.188 | 0.232 | 0.04 | * | ||
| Conventional | Islamic | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | M | M | Mean difference | |||
| E1 | 0.1723 | 0.07593 | 0.4500 | 0.23290 | 0.278 | 0.000 |
| E2 | 0.2062 | 0.12316 | 0.4636 | 0.16473 | 0.257 | 0.000 |
| E3 | 0.0687 | 0.03171 | 0.0177 | 0.01317 | (0.051) | 0.000 |
| E4 | 0.0653 | 0.05561 | 0.0123 | 0.00671 | (0.053) | 0.001 |
| E5 | 0.6690 | 0.28030 | 0.8641 | 0.29594 | 0.195 | 0.058 |
| E6 | 0.2536 | 0.25440 | 0.0202 | 0.06585 | (0.233) | 0.001 |
| E7 | 0.0309 | 0.03263 | 0.0109 | 0.00852 | (0.020) | 0.021 |
| E8 | 0.0369 | 0.07723 | 0.0174 | 0.18051 | (0.020) | 0.692 |
| Average | 0.188 | 0.232 | 0.04 | |||
Note:
IBs perform better in terms of LQ